God’s
Sabbath: Michael Bunker comments On the Sabbath and what it means to Christians.
My
own personal conversion to the Sabbath
Although
this letter is designed as a discussion of the Lord’s Sabbath, I do not plan
(in this first section) on discussing which day should be set apart as the
Sabbath (I find it far less important an issue), but, instead, I intend to note
the mental processes that I went through in bringing this area of my life under
the government of Christ Jesus.
When the Lord first began to really call me to Himself in a personal way, I was
working several jobs. One of my jobs was as a part-time bartender at a very
busy university bar. One of my primary (and most lucrative) shifts was Sunday
afternoon for the Sunday football crowd.
Although I had been nominally “raised a Christian”, I knew very little
about the Bible at this time (I was reading through it for the first time), and
I had absolutely no direction from any type of spiritual authority; but I just
knew (in a somewhat spiritual way) that I was to keep holy what I thought was
the Sabbath day. I went to my boss and told him that I could not work on Sunday
any more because I wanted to keep the Sabbath holy. My boss (who was also a
good friend of mine) not only understood, but he later told me it impressed him
that I was so eager to please God.
As time went on, I never lost the spiritual "knowing" that I was to
separate out the Sabbath day, although my immersion in "church" and
other activities soon wore out my willingness to actually do what I knew I
believed.
When I finally separated from the corrupt institutional church system, I gave
up on the idea of the Sabbath completely, not in my conscience, but in my
actual behavior. I also was so repulsed by the evil Judaizing of the modern Messianic
movement that I (rightly, I believe) determined to make spiritual freedom from
religious tyranny and legalism a hallmark of my ministry. I don't believe I was wrong in doing this,
but I am certain that I overreacted to what were very real threats, by further
searing my conscience and by grieving the Holy Spirit in regards to the
Sabbath.
Through
the years, I have said to my wife on many occasions "we really ought to make an effort to keep the Sabbath day
holy"; although I was never really willing to do what I knew was the right thing to do. This is one of the few
decisions in my ministry that I truly regret, because I am pretty well known
for making hard decisions - and at some level, this failure must necessarily
harm my credibility in other areas.
On
several occasions over the last few years, I have been pressed (by friends and
strangers alike) to speak on the issue - but I have always refused. On occasion I would throw out an offhand "Jesus is the Sabbath’s rest"
line, just to get me out of the situation.
But in my conscience, I knew that this was an issue in my life that
needed to be brought under God's government.
When
I began teaching the Doctrines of Grace in all their fullness, we were somewhat
a "voice in the wilderness", and there was not a big Sovereignty
movement going on at the time (almost none actually) like there seems to be
now. Since then, as the new Reformation has gained steam, more Puritan and
Reformed books have been made available to the public, and I have had the
opportunity to really get in and study the issue more.
Recently, the issue came to a head with me when I began to really dig into the
issue, and when I saw that my family was suffering from an irreverence and
disrespect to spiritual authority and also when it came to things that should
be considered "Holy". I could
see the same irreverence in myself, and I could see it in my children. It is natural for those of us who escape
religious tyranny to flee far beyond what is a safe position and, as a result,
to become irreverent and presumptuous.
Recently
I have been dealing with this issue in my house, with my family and with the
others who live here. It has been a wonderful and rewarding experience...
“Let
man only enter into God’s mind and tread in His footsteps, by resting every
seventh day from his works, and he shall undoubtedly find it to his profit…
What he may lose for the moment in productive employment, shall be amply
compensated by the refreshment it will bring to his frame – by the enlargement
and elevation of his soul – above all, by the spiritual fellowship and interest
in God which becomes the abiding portion of those who follow Him in their ways,
and perpetually return to Him as the supreme rest of their souls.” (1900, Patrick Fairbairn, Typology
of Scripture, pg. 259)
And God
blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested
from all his work which God created and made. - Genesis 2:3
First note that God “blessed” the seventh
day. He mentions that He sanctifies it
as a separate issue. He not only sanctified it (set it apart), but he blessed
it. Here we see that God actually blessed
the day. He bestowed blessings upon it, not unto Himself (for we know that
the Sabbath was not made for God, for God needs no rest). God rested on the Sabbath as a sign, a
shadow or a “type”, as He could no further be refreshed or perfected than his
eternal, unchangeable character demands.
He specifically BLESSED the Sabbath day. God hid special blessings in store for those who would but receive
those blessings by rest. In a special
mystery, he planted into the fabric of the creation unalterable laws that work
in the favor of those who will honestly and spiritually look to submitting
themselves to God’s government and Sovereignty through the rest provided in the
Sabbath. In a delicious sort of irony,
no work can be more profitable than to endeavor to enter into this rest. That rest is not just spiritual, in that the Apostle says that we are to work to enter therein. An evident sign of our submission to God’s
authority is in our humbly assuming His image and walking after Him. But how bountiful is the secret treasure
stored up for those who will heed God’s commandments? Simply look into the treasure chest and you will see.
Second, God “sanctified” the Sabbath day. He set it apart for a specific and eternal
purpose. He set His mark upon it and
painted innumerable types and shadows in the reality of the former dispensations
to show weary travelers where rest might be found. Fairbairn points out that man’s lot, indeed his destiny, was to
be placed into a position whereby he must work, albeit he must work as a
reasonable and rational being. The
repose of the Sabbath was designed to be a signpost of the promise of eternal
rest and redemption, in a dispensation when man must work for his increase by
the sweat of his brow. But far from
being a burdensome command, or even a distasteful one, the Sabbath gave great
comfort to those who sorrowed in being separated by the veil from the presence
of their God. Legalism crept in. Rationalism and human inventions corrupted
the reality of God’s gift. Some began
to despise even the word “Sabbath” for all the evil that had been done under
its banner. But God has evidently
“sanctified” the day, in that he placed it as a signpost for those who have
eyes to see. How noticeable is it that
the enemy has tried to rip down every signpost that leads to the special
blessings of God? In ancient times, a
“landmark” was a sign that instructed you where one property stopped and where
another started. The landmark was also
used to instruct travelers along the way where they might be welcomed and where
they might find rest.
“Remove
not the ancient landmark, which
thy fathers have set” (Proverbs 22:28)
In future articles (Lord Willing = DV), I will
lay out not only a case for the continuing responsibility towards the Sabbath,
but I hope to more clearly make a case for why the blood-bought child of God
should have a desire towards the Sabbath of God.
The Sabbath is a sign. It is a signpost to our final rest, and it is a sign to the world
that we are different, and that we truly believe in God’s sovereignty. We don’t “believe” it in only an intellectual
way, but we truly believe it in a real way.
We believe that God has set apart (sanctified) this day by blessing it
to those who will seek it in purity.
This is not a salvation issue.
This is a maturity issue. The
GOSPEL is more specifically THE GOSPEL OF
THE KINGDOM. Being in the Kingdom
is being under the government of Almighty God, and admitting it in our
worldview and in our lives. Woe unto me
if I preach not the Gospel – which is to say, “Woe unto me if my life reflects
not the Gospel”.
For me and my house, we have entered into an even
closer walk with our Creator. We’ll let
the simpletons, legalists and humanists argue about the exact, strict nature of
its details. We’ll let the Judaizers
and fable pushers gorge themselves on their own prideful fantasies regarding
it. We’ll let the talkers (see Pilgrim’s Progress) and the worldly wise men debate its value.
They question it, because they cannot (or will not) partake in it
truly. The treasure of blessings is
locked fast against them. It is really
a work of God and it is wonderful to behold.
My prayer has been this… “Lord, bring me under your government. Teach me your perfect way. Place me under your yoke and do not hide
yourself from me. Soothe my damaged
conscience by chastising your child, and let the world be damned if they don’t
get it.” I ask God daily to make us a
spectacle to the worldly, and a landmark to those weary travels who seek rest
for their souls.
This is a family project and it is wonderful to
behold.
The Sabbath and God’s Sovereignty
The
virtual disappearance of practical godliness in our land must drive us to
examine ourselves and our Christian lives, because if there is no fault or no
cause behind the devastation and eradication of practical godliness, then God
Himself could rightly be said to have brought about that which His law forbids,
His nature abhors and His character denies; But we know that God is not the
fountainhead of sin, and it is evident in scripture that it is sin that is the
cause of practical ungodliness and it is sin that is a cancer to any
nation. It is sin (generally allowed
by, and proceeding from those who profess to be the children of God) that most
certainly and inevitably brings destruction and judgment on a people.
It
has always been my position, that our faithful actions out to spring from the
certain knowledge that:
a)
There
is a God who is Lord and Sovereign over all of Creation. He is made evident to us by the light of
nature, and by the Holy Scriptures; and He, being good, perfect, benevolent,
loving, merciful and full of all grace, is the One and only object of our
worship.
b)
This
One, perfect, Holy and Sovereign God of all Creation has spoken in an
unmistakable way in the Holy Bible, through the revelation of Jesus Christ in
due time, and in everything that God alone has created.
c)
Having
spoken in an unmistakable way, He is to be obeyed and worshipped only in those
ways instituted by Himself, and in those ways He has commanded; and He is not
to be disregarded or ignored in that which He has ordained and commanded by men
who seek to worship Him according to the devices of their own minds, or in a
manner that men concoct based on their own fallen reasoning.
d)
To
disobey God in those reasonable services that He has required of us brings
curses and sufferings on any people whose fear of God has waned to the point
that they are willing to trade the plain and simple blessings of an eternal God
for the carnal and transient benefits of a perishing world.
Earlier
in this article, I pointed out the many blessings that are promised in
scripture for those who recognize and honor the Sabbath day. It is evident throughout history that those
nations and peoples who have honored and kept the Sabbath day have prospered
both physically and spiritually. It is
also evident by a simple review of history that those who have forsaken this
commandment of God, have soon passed from disobedience to practical
ungodliness, from ungodliness to blatant rebellion and warfare against God, and
from rebellion against God, to destruction.
There are
primarily two views in the world today which have led to the almost unanimous
“decision” by the world’s people not to honor the Sabbath day:
1) The position of the heathen (the
unreligious or irreligious) that the Sabbath is only for religious extremists
and can not be imposed upon them. (We
agree with this position regarding the heathen. The Sabbath is not for them.)
2)
The
position of most religious people (particularly in America) that the Sabbath
was part of the law that was done away with on the Cross, and is no longer
binding on Christians. (With this opinion, we most strenuously object; but we
sadly conclude that the Sabbath is likely not for them either.)
Based
on this last argument, let us make a review of where these arguments fail, and
in what category we should place them.
Specifically regarding the moral
law, there are two main views:
1.)
Christ
kept the law because I could not =
Christianity
2.) Christ kept the law so I don't have to = Antinomianism (literally –
“lawlessness”)
Regarding the purpose of the moral law, we look at the same two positions:
1.)
According
to Christianity, in the NT the Law is still a mirror that shows us our
inability and requires of us our duty.
2.)
According
to Antinomianism, in the NT the mirror is removed, so our morality has no real
concrete bounds outside of how we think we should act in certain situations
(situational ethics).
Regarding
the extent and application of the moral law, here are the two positions:
1.)
According
to Christianity, the moral law is an eternal exposition of God's character. It
defines what is (and what is not) sin. It is eternally binding on all of God's
children, and it is the binding nature of the law that shows us the necessity
of salvation through Jesus Christ.
2.)
According
to Antinomianism, the moral law is completed (and therefore expunged) in
Christ. It cannot be binding on us; because where there is no eternal
punishment, there can be no eternal law. Since I can't lose my salvation, then
I can sin all I want to and grace will abound.
Now most Antinomians won't come out and admit these things, but these are the
inevitable end of their thinking and theology. They will call us legalists,
although they must admit that grace cannot abound where there is no law.
Without law, grace is irrelevant. The more lawless a man is in the inner man, the
more he will obscure the law with obfuscation.
It is the antinomian who is the legalist, because he cannot allow any limits to
his freedom - so necessarily his lawless freedom becomes a law that is binding
on the minds and consciences of other men.
If I tell a man that the moral law requires me to keep the Sabbath, his legalist mind must condemn me
quickly before his conscience condemns him. He is locked into a defensive
posture by his legalist misinterpretations of scripture. He cannot answer me a simple question:
If you can say, "I'm secure enough
in my salvation not to keep the sabbath", why can I not say, "I'm
secure enough in my salvation to kill you (commit murder)"?
Where, now, is his lawlessness? I have found that liars, coveters, homosexuals,
adulterers and other antinomians require very strict laws when it comes to
those who would murder them, but
reject any strict laws that limit their own lawless behavior. So where, then, is the standard? I say the eternal standard is the moral
law. It must be. This is the argument that cannot be refuted.
Jesus
Christ enumerated the fullness of what was required of us when He was asked
what the greatest commandment was in the law.
A tempter, who desired to get Jesus to abdicate or toss out the moral law,
was laying a trap for Jesus. Jesus said, "thou shalt love the Lord thy God
with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the
first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love
thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the
prophets" (Matthew 22:37-40).
This
summation not only shut the mouths of the Pharisees (who could not now
legitimately claim that Jesus was voiding the moral law), and gave to those of
us who truly believe in Him, the firm answer that we need concerning the place
of the moral law. A friend of ours put
the answer plainly, “When you look at it,
that is, when you look at the Decalogue (the Ten Commandments), you will find that the first 4
commandments deal with our love of God, the next commandment, the 5th deals
exclusively with family, that is our parents, and the last 5 deal with society
at large, that is, our neighbor. Of course there is overlap in that we worship
God when we don't steal, etc, but in general, this is how they are presented.”
When
I endeavor to find out HOW to love God, I am left with His instruction to keep
His commandments (John 14:15, 15:10); If I then ask, “which commandments”? I must either answer, “The Ten Commandments”, which actually instruct me how to love God,
or I must do like the religious world does and answer, “the two commandments of Jesus”, which tells me TO love God, but
not HOW TO love God. One way gives me
my answer; the other way just loops back around to the question again. It is interesting to note that Jesus tells
us, “If you love me, you will keep my commandments”; and specifically within
the listing of the Ten Commandments are the words, “…shewing mercy unto thousands that love me, and keep my commandments”.
So…
how do I love God?
The
first 4 commandments show me what I will be like when I truly love God:
“I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of
Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou
shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the
iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And
shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not
hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. Remember the sabbath day, to
keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh
day is the sabbath of the LORD
thy God: in it thou shalt not
do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy
maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: For in
six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day:
wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it” (Exodus
20:2-11).
When
I love God, I will forsake all other “gods”, I will forsake idolatry (even the
appearance of it), I will not take the LORD’s name in vain (many people have
taken the LORD’s name in vain, because they call themselves CHRISTians, when
they do not care to show they love Him by obeying Him), and I will keep the
Sabbath day holy and separate unto Him.
The
Purpose of the Moral Law
The
moral law does not exist to justify me before God; (no act of man could do what
only the righteousness and obedience of Christ could do), rather, the law
exists to show me my true needful state, continuously, so that I remain mindful
of that need, and in a worshipful state before God.
The
moral law remains as a binding obligation for the benefit of man; not for his
righteousness, but for his well-being.
The Sabbath of God (a gift to man) stands as monument to God’s mercy and
grace towards His people, while it simultaneously exists as a memorial to our
inability to ever please God by our own works.
So it is a mistake for anyone to conclude that we keep the Sabbath in
order to please God. God is eternally
pleased with His sheep, since He looks on us from His throne of Grace and sees
the Sabbath as perfectly fulfilled and completed in the person of Jesus Christ
as our federal representative. Most
people miss the message of the Sabbath because they cannot see any other view
other than man’s view Godward. They
say, “If it isn’t to please God, who do
it?” which is really a foolish argument, since only the righteous works of
God Himself can please an omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent God. Man neglects to note that Christ kept every
element of all the law on behalf of His sheep.
He kept the commandment to not murder
for me, and He kept the commandment to not
covet for me. Does this free me to
be murderous and covetous? Do I say, “Because Christ perfectly kept the law, I
can now murder and covet”? Does
Christ keeping the commandment against idolatry for me (specifically) free me
to worship other Gods? Surely no true
Christian would ever come to that conclusion… but we daily hear from people who
are absolutely certain that since Jesus Christ became the fulfillment of the shadows
and types provided by the Sabbath, that they are free to harm themselves by
rejecting one of God’s commandments.
These people miss the fact that that my well-being, my spiritual health,
my proper God-view rests on my humility.
Only by looking into the looking glass that is the law (James 1:23) do
we see our true state, and by doing so, the true Christian keeps in mind his
needful state, and has before his eyes his utter hopelessness without God’s
grace and mercy. Just once begin to
reject God’s moral commandment as something that does not apply to you and you
become that man who looks into the looking glass, and walks away without
remembering what sort of man he is.
I
will end this section on the defense of the Sabbath with the question that I
receive the most on this subject:
“But
Jesus Christ IS the Sabbath, and the physical Sabbath is just a shadow."
My Answer: “And yet, marriage is a
shadow, and that is all it is.”
I've
taught that for 6 years – marriage is a shadow - but we don't seem to be in a
hurry to put it away. Marriage is a
beautiful shadow of Christ and His Church (when it is done right) and it
serves as a show to society and our children what Christ and His Church is
about. Marriage and the Sabbath are so
intimately linked that they will occupy one chapter in my book on the
subject. What is the difference between
marriage and the Sabbath? Marriage is
easy to start doing because our flesh wants it, but it is hard to keep doing if the man and the woman are
not both governed by Christ. The
Sabbath is hard to start doing because
our flesh doesn't want to be governed by God, but it is easy to keep doing it
if we are governed by Christ. The rest that
is provided to us in marriage is so valuable, that it is accepted by all but
the most heretical cults that marriage is fundamentally a building block of a
Christian society. Marriage, as a
shadow, was instituted for the benefit of man and not for God; it is a picture
and a type of our eternal rest and satisfaction with God in heaven.
When
the institute of Christian Marriage is obediently followed, it physiologically
and spiritually serves our well being.
Why would we throw out Marriage because it is abused by some, and
because it is only a shadow? We
wouldn’t. So let us not throw out those
things that serve us and help us… like the Sabbath.
So, When is the Sabbath Anyway?
The
question, “What day is the Sabbath?”
has been an age old topic of discussion, debate, argument, warfare, and even the
cause of disfellowship and schism in the Church. Why is that? It seems
that once we decide that the Sabbath is (and ought to be) a perpetual
obligation of every true Christian, the value gained by that wise and obedient
revelation is then subverted in the subsequent argument about… WHEN?
The
Apostles, the primitive church, and the Reformers were uniform in one aspect of
the Sabbath… it was to be one day in seven, or “every seventh day”. Some believe (as I do) that the Bible
defines and perpetually places the Sabbath day as the 7th day, when
God rested from His works. Some believe
that since the Bible clearly teaches that the 1st day of the week is
the “Lord’s Day”, that these two appellations are really one in the same,
therefore they believe that the Sabbath was changed to the 1st day
of the week after the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ. There is no
doubt that competing camps can well defend their positions, and that they each
have legitimate arguments for their position.
Historically (outside of Scripture) we can find a basis for either
position. It is evident from my reading
that the very primitive church, up until the destruction of Jerusalem in 70
a.d., kept the Saturday Sabbath and celebrated the Lord’s resurrection on the
first day of the week (the Lord’s Day).
Since the bulk of the primitive church in that time was of Jewish
heritage, they saw no problems with delineating in their minds between the
Sabbath (which was a day of family rest and did not allow them to travel for
communion and fellowship) and Sunday, which was a day of “meeting”, where they
brethren met house to house to celebrate and worship.
After
the destruction of Jerusalem, when the early church had to more seriously
combat the evils and pernicious ways of the Jewish unregenerate “nominal
christians”, most of the early churches (like that in Antioch under
Theosophorus) then rejected the Saturday Sabbath as a tool of Judaizers, and
instead chose to focus the time of worship and rest on Sunday.
I
personally have no problem combating Judaistic teachings and still allowing the
Sabbath to remain (as I believe the Bible teaches it to be) perennially on the
7th day. And I believe that
there is a mysterious shadow of these two weekly holy days, in the mystery of
the first Passover:
“And in the
first day there shall be an holy convocation, and in the seventh day there shall be an holy convocation to you;
no manner of work shall be done in them, save that which every man must eat,
that only may be done of you” (Exodus 12:16).
Now
we, as believers, live in the Lord’s Passover (Jesus Christ), and are being
brought into our Sabbath’s rest (the Kingdom), so the shadow picture is
complete, but I believe that the Apostle Paul removes all need for contention
for us in his epistle to the Colossians:
“Let
no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday,
or of the new moon, or of the sabbath
days: Which are a
shadow of things to come; but the body is
of Christ”
(Colossians 2:16-17).
As
we have said throughout this study, the Sabbath is a shadow, and should never
become a legalistic ritual, or a reason to judge a brother as to which day
(notice it says “Sabbath days”) he chooses to set aside for solemn rest and the
worship of God. This is not the
authorization that some seek to totally reject and eschew the Sabbath
altogether, because the verses cannot be twisted to allow for that
interpretation; rather, it says for us to not allow ourselves to be judged “in respect… of the Sabbath days”,
which means in respect to which day we choose to celebrate the Lord’s
Sabbath. I personally believe that the
Sabbath is perpetually on Saturday (from Friday at sundown to Saturday
sundown):
“And
on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the
seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the seventh
day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work
which God created and made” (Genesis
2:2-3).
and
I believe that the seventh day is to be set aside for rest and family worship
alone; but I also believe that the Lord has instituted for us in scripture “The
Lord’s Day”, and this was the day when the primitive church met together
(assembled):
“Then the same day at evening, being the
first day of the week,
when the doors were shut where the
disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in
the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be
unto you” (John
20:19).
“And
upon the first day of the week, when the disciples
came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart
on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight” (Act 20:7).
Now,
I understand that in our modernist religious time this opinion (that both days
are sacred and set aside for different purposes) seems like a unique one. But my conscience is captive to the Word of
God, and I cannot see why it cannot be true (since it is so evident in
scripture) that the Sabbath day (Saturday) was set aside for rest (no work) and
family worship and instruction, while the Lord’s Day (Sunday) was set aside for
communal service, assembly of the Saints and breaking of bread. Does setting these days aside for God and
His service cost us anything? Well….
Yes it does; for if we choose to live the life that God has ordained for us, we
will become a spectacle to the world and to the principalities and powers in
the heavenlies. If we choose to
regulate ourselves according to the Bible (by interpretation of the Holy Spirit
alone) then we will suffer persecution from the world, the flesh, and the
devil. And why shouldn’t the world hate
us?
So
we must recognize that:
1st
– the Sabbath is, and ought to be, a perpetual obligation (as a part of the
moral law) for every Christian. It is
for the Saint’s well-being and spiritual health, and is profitable far beyond
what the physical eyes and ears can determine.
2nd
– The Sabbath is one day out of seven, being every seventh day, and should be
set aside as a time apart from our normal work and worries, and should be a
time where we protect our minds and spirits from the stress and tension of the
modernist world, so that we can build ourselves up in the faith, forge stronger
family ties and bonds, and focus our attention on our Redeemer and King.
3rd
– The Sabbath should not be a legalistic duty or burden, but should be both a
joy and a respite from the pains and sorrows of this present world… it should
be a sign of the work that we engage in to enter into our eternal rest (Heb.
4:11), and it should be a teaching tool for our families and future
generations.
If
we believe these things, then we will do
them… blessed are those who both believe and do… AMEN.
Your
servant in Christ Jesus,
Michael
Bunker
editor@lazarusunbound.com
DISAGREE? Discuss or Debate this: Forum
Read more like this: Bunker
Mentality Archives
Proceed back to the Homepage...
Back to the top!
