|
|
| Subscribe to Michael Bunker's podcast |
swarms of locusts - Swarms provides the reader with a fascinating look at the detrimental impact that the Jesuits have had in undermining genuine Biblical Christianity.

|
the bunker mentality...
Bring the Lions
October 26, 2001 The enemy has successfully kept the nominal Christian out of the fight. He has convinced the Christian that his place is in the institutional church, strapped to a plow, and not at the foot of the Cross. He has deified Compromise, and demonized Courage. He has convinced the Christian man that mental and physical pacifism will be easily mistaken for spiritual gallantry. He has sold us a proxy for all that the Lord desired for us. He has convinced the religious world that “authority” is a sword only rightly wielded by government and the church, and that submission means bowing the knee to political and ecclesiastical Caesars. But our enemy is surely the Father of all Lies. Maybe you have believed a few of them? Jesus said that He was as a man taking a far journey. He said that He left his house, and gave AUTHORITY to his servants. In the Gospel of John, we learn that Jesus Christ had received from his Father, the AUTHORITY to do judgment and justice. Jesus Christ, upon leaving this earth, gave the awesome authority and responsibility to do judgment and justice to HIS SERVANTS. His Servants were to serve as this authority in His absence. Throughout the history of national Israel we see that God holds the people directly responsible for their government. The 13th chapter of Romans is likely the most misconstrued and abused section of scripture in modern history. In these verses, Paul identifies the specific punishment that awaits those who deny this Godly authority. Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. The word power in verse 2, is the Greek word EXOUSIA - which is translated throughout the New Testament as AUTHORITY. In America, this authority was codified forever into the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The Constitution explicitly stated that authority was given by GOD to MAN. And that The People, held the authority on earth, in God’s stead. Particularly, many of the founders believed that a Christian people were the only people who could properly govern themselves. If they were maintained and guided by GOD indwelling them, they could properly extend judgment and justice to a dead and dying world. Specifically, Government was instituted among men so that evildoers would be punished, and that all murderers would be killed. In Genesis 9 verse 6 we learn that the authority was given to MAN to punish murderers. Only in the new world was this authority taken literally. We are a nation of KINGS and PRIESTS. As a council of Kings, we instituted among ourselves a subservient servant-government designed to do judgment and justice on our behalf. But when the servant becomes abusive of these ends, when it goes about smiting the innocent and protecting the guilty - God shall hold the King responsible for the evil done in the land. In America, the biblical institution of government was properly aligned. Righteous men were to be the Kings, wielding the sword of justice, and the servant of man was the government. Maybe you have been sold a proxy for even this Godly institution? Now, it seems, that whores in the parliament and in the church have decreed that THEY are the authority. They sit in the seat of Christ as Lawgiver and Priest. Only through them may we be deemed good servants. But what did Christ say? He said that he left authority with US, his servants, and that He will return on the day appointed to receive a report on how we disposed our duties on His behalf! Well, Lord… We have turned the authority of KING over to tyrants and murderers. We would not be ruled by the perfect Law of Righteousness. We suffered fools and devils to rule over us. Since we were not righteous, we allowed your decreed hierarchy to be inverted. The innocent and the just are slain without defense, while the evil ones are permitted to prosper. We would not accept your invitation to be a nation of Kings and Priests, so we placed hirelings and devils on the throne. We abdicated our responsibility so that when you return, Lord, we can point to the hirelings and shake our heads because our sleeping shepherds convinced us that our hands would be clean. For filthy lucre’s sake, they refused to tell us the truth. Around us you may examine the fruit of our folly. Still the cowards and charlatans scream for pacifism at all costs. Amerika has become a place like one that is mentioned in Hosea - all her princes are revolters. Yet the King (the people) will not demand justice and judgment, nor will this council of Kings wield the sword in order to defend the defenseless or to punish and vanquish his rebellious servants. The King has become a rewarder of that which is evil and a punisher of that which is good. How will such a King stand the judgment that rightly comes upon his land? They should hate you. This world is corrupt. It should hate you and despitefully use you. One of my good brothers was attacked the other day. His mother-in-law had been watching the mainstream media reports on Terrorism. She called her daughter and asked if my friend, her husband, was “a terrorist” like Bin Ladin. He must be a terrorist is he is anti-government, right? My friend was perplexed and angry. I told him, Don’t be. Where are our stripes? If all those who choose to live Godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution where is OUR persecution? Why are we not yet beaten for righteousness sake? It is not a commentary on society; it is a commentary on US. Lord, here is our prayer Make us in your image. If we are like you, the world will have to hate us. Lord God make us more like you. Have them pick up rods and stones against us, O’ Lord. Do not threaten us with our mother-in-laws Bring the lions! To whom are you listening? Let us change gears for a moment to emphasize the point. Courage has been swapped with Compromise. Their meanings have been inverted. There has been much talk lately of Summer Soldiers and Sunshine Patriots. In these days of empty rhetoric, there seems to be an overabundance of verbal compromise and a dearth of shoe-leather courage. This quote from Thomas Paine has been circulating on the internet: These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. It seems that we are now enamored with the alternative media. Yet these same alternative media outlets bow the knee to the same god of compromise and mammon as the mainstream media from which they try so hard to separate themselves. I’ll give you an example: Two of the most hyped alternative opinion sources around today are Fox News (particularly Bill O’Reilly), and WorldNetDaily. Both of these news/opinion sources trumpet their independence and their willingness to challenge the politically correct thinking of the day. Both of these sources shout that they are the place for you to go to get the No-Spin truth about the issues of the day. REALLY? Ask yourselves, would MY opinions (which are reasonable and rational when compared with those of the revolutionaries and the reformers of the past, although they are certainly unreasonable when weighed on a modern group-think scale) be allowed on either of these alternative news or opinion sources? You can bet NOT! The truth, it seems, is important only so long as it is easily digestible, warmed over, and sterile. They will herald their own willingness to be politically incorrect, only so far as that mindset doesn’t finally and ultimately brazenly challenge the legitimacy of the two reigning institutions of church and state. I am repeatedly questioned as to why I have not been asked to offer commentary on any of the burgeoning alternative media outlets. I will tell you why I will not be invited to their party. The plain and simple truth is; they are not as willing to shock the system as they say they are. There can only be three possible reasons:
I must agree with them on a critical point. Giving space for my voice to be heard would surely cause them grief. They would likely lose advertisers and they would certainly lose some of their audience. But I believe that they would gain much more than they would lose, in both audience AND credibility. I was speaking to a Pastor the other day. We were discussing my extremism and he stated that, although he thought I had much to offer in the way of ideas and insight, my unwillingness to soften (compromise) my message would assure that I was never heard. I repeated to him something that I have said often in the last few weeks. During the Reformation, it cannot be argued that the Catholic Church did not at least offer to hear the case of the Reformers. That is to their credit. They were willing to hear those who protested. Sure, they branded many of them heretics and summarily killed them, but at least the early Reformers got on the stage. Today, the new Papists, both the governmental and the ecclesiastical types, have blocked the stage. Alternative ideas are acceptable so long as they accept ONE basic premise. I am not allowed on the stage of ideas because I do not, at least, accept the premise that their failed institutions are legitimate. How can we, as Christians, accept these alternative media outlets as credible? They would have banned the thinking of Jonathan Edwards, Charles Spurgeon and Martin Luther from the arena of popular discourse. Not to mention that they would have shunned or ignored the likes of Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams. But don’t start calling me a media communist, or a closet socialist. I am not demanding that they give me equal time. I am only reflecting on their willingness to exalt their own bravery and political incorrectness. They should just admit that they are not really so courageous, and not quite so willing to ignore the bottom dollar, as they claim that they are. At the end of the day, they are willing to say only what the bulk of their audience is willing to hear. They are willing to stand on the very edge of the cutting edge, but they are not willing to step over it. They desire an audience which itself desires to be handed only that with which it already agrees. It’s a circular fan club, and nobody has to be uncomfortable or even challenged. Back to our Main Point. If we are so willing to accept group-think and the approval of men - what makes us think that we will not shrink from the fight that, even now, steamrolls towards us. When we accept compromise and call it courage, why are we surprised when even our own children cannot tell the difference between the two? In Christ Jesus, I am a living, spiritual, freeman. Why should I be afraid to shout GIVE ME LIBERTY OR GIVE ME DEATH! from the mountaintop? Why would I possibly accept physical Liberty at the price of spiritual death? And why would I accept physical Life at the price of spiritual bondage? Why must I be asked to believe that virtue and righteousness can be found in compromise? The institutional church cannot spiritually enslave me, and our tyrannical government cannot spiritually kill me. So far as my spirit goes, they hold the authority of NEITHER my Liberty, nor my Life. As a King and Priest of the Most High God I have the authority to serve notice on tyrants and cowards You may hate me. You may muzzle me. You might even kill or incarcerate me. But you will not be able to assimilate me. I will not be lukewarm. Bring the lions. I am your servant in Christ Jesus, DISAGREE? Discuss or Debate this: Forum Read more like this: Bunker Mentality Archives Proceed back to the Homepage...
|
|
Home | FAQ | Archives | Doctrines | Contact | Donate | BiblicalAgrarianism.com | A Process Driven Life |