Silly Ol’ Stan, 2

By Michael Bunker editor@lazarusunbound.com Want to discuss it? Try the Forum

Read Silly Ol' Stan I, or read YOUR E-MAILED RESPONSES

Here is some more of my response to Stan Johnson's letter. Some of it must be discussed for us to get a clearer picture of how manipulators work, and why it is important to shine light on their works.

One of the most interesting and telling parts of Stan Johnson's attack on Michael Bunker, is this: Stan has pulled all of my materials off of his website. Not because I demanded that he do so, but because, according to Stan:

“I must ask myself, if Michael has distorted, exaggerated and stretched the facts concerning my relationship with him-facts I can prove concerning his relationship with us, his videos and book-did he make his videos with the same inaccuracy? I have no other choice but to answer, ‘Yes.’ So effective immediately, The Prophecy Club will place Michael Bunker on the short list with other speakers. The list of ‘No longer recommended’. Effective immediately, The Prophecy Club no longer offers Michael Bunker's book or videos, or anything with Michael Bunker's name on it.”

Let us look at this issue.

Stan Johnson desires that the accuracy of my videos be the hallmark, or the measuring stick by which you judge my veracity in exposing him and his club. Excellent idea.

Who has told you the truth, Michael Bunker or Stan Johnson? My technology videos, done through the Prophecy Club, are considered (by most thinking people) to be the most accurate materials ever produced by the Club. We successfully predicted the rise and fall of a major U.S. corporation, along with the dispensation of it's assets. My first video was so accurate, that I was called to go to the U.S. Congress office building to meet with Congressman Chris Cox (with a PC M.C. as my driver) in order to explain how I got some of the details on the Chinagate scandal. While Stan Johnson, the Prophecy Club, and his pocket-prophets and annointed Apostles have failed miserably in their attempts to predict ANYTHING that is going to happen (they have a stunning 0% accuracy rating), my information, after 3 years of scrutiny, has proven to be impeccable. I predicted the rise of Iridium, proving that that company was a fraud from day one. The video stands on it's own. On that video, I predicted that Iridium would declare bankruptcy, and that they would subsequently be purchased and/or controlled by the US Military. I was right. Videos number 2 and 3 document our 100% accuracy rating. Everything that I have said would come to pass, based on my research, has come to pass.

Stan Johnson paid a man to go on tour who claimed to be Moses.

After having learned of this heresy, Stan Johnson continued to market and sell this man's materials. Who can be trusted?

Stan Johnson STILL markets and sells materials from other speakers who have absolutely missed every date and prediction that they have made. Stan still markets and sells materials from men who have to reprint their "prophetic" calendars every year. Who can be trusted?

You be the judge. Let's look at Stan's own letter to me. In my letter, I related a story about my last meeting with Stan Johnson. From a hotel room in South Bend, Indiana - I sent young Jordan on a mission to learn the truth about deception and manipulation. That story is related in my article entitled, The Prophecy Club Story. In Stan's reply, he equivocated and even lied about this event.

Here is how Stan Johnson relates that event:

SJ — “You should know the Lord told us it was a set up as soon as he knocked on the door.”

MB — “RIGHT”

SJ — “I chose my words very carefully with Bunker's friend because I knew Bunker was disagreeing with us concerning the Crusades. What Bunker overlooked in his story was how Jordan received the personal prophecy that night. One of the ways people respond when the Lord is speaking to them is emotion. They get emotional. They can't help it.”

MB — “When people react emotionally, it is usually because you are playing on their EMOTIONS. Emotions are part of the soul (mind, will, emotions). God speaks to people in the Spirit. Because He IS Spirit. You sir, are an emotional manipulator, and you have grown rich by it.”

SJ — “As I was prophesying to him, I noticed him wipe a tear away. Now if you ask him don't be surprised if he doesn't remember the tear. They remember the Word, not the response. As you have pointed out he remembered the word-which is a strong indication he also received it as a Word from the Lord. Jonathan told me he accepted the Word as ‘right on.’”

MB — If ‘remembering’ something, is an indication that it is from the Lord. Why can't you remember JORDAN's name? His name is not Jonathan, it is JORDAN! Now, who can we trust? I tell you what, we'll let Jordan respond to this:

FROM JORDAN AVANT:

JA — ‘Stan, you are a liar. Two points I would like to make:

1. If you can't remember my name, how can you remember a small, minute detail like a tear?
   
   
2. To anyone who hasn't had the opportunity of receiving a personal prophecy from Stan Johnson, I'll tell you this; His eyes are closed the entire time! How can he read how I respond, when he has his eyes closed? His eyes being closed lets him think of the best way to include his Jesus Crusades in what appears to be YOUR prophecy.
   
   
3. Stan, if you KNEW that it was a setup, then why would you not assume that I would PRETEND to receive your goofy ‘prophecy’?

Repent while you still have a chance, Stan.” — Jordan Avant.

SO, according to Stan's own criteria. Who you gonna trust?

Let's us consider Stan's prophecy with a wider focus. Has anyone seen a man, whose REAL name is Jonathan, on the Sci-Fi channel? He is your standard demonized paranormalist. He gives people “prophecies” too. He holds their hand and closes his eyes. He asks them leading questions, then gives them unspecific and general prophecies based on what he either:

1. discerns from his leading questions, or
   
2. receives from devils.

Stan Johnson asked Jordan, “Are you married?”

Jordan said, “No”.

SJ — “You are worried about your relationships, and about what that means for your future.”

JORDAN IS A TWENTY-YEAR OLD, unmarried young man. DUHHH!

I ask you again. Who you gonna trust?

Stan says he can no longer sell Michael Bunker materials…Good for us, and good for the people. No more confusion. They can choose this day who they will trust. Stan Johnson continues to be convicted by his own words. But let us look at what Stan Johnson was REALLY saying. He contrasted my credibility with his Prophecy Club. If you believe that Michael Bunker is credible, you MUST by Stan's own reasoning, come to the conclusion that Stan Johnson's view of events is skewed and unreliable. You MUST, by Stan's own reasoning, come to the conclusion that ANYTHING that he says, cannot be trusted. According to Stan Johnson, IF you find that Michael Bunker's videos on technology were credible, you MUST then assume that ALL that Michael Bunker has said about the Prophecy Club and Stan Johnson can be believed and trusted.

I ask that you, the brethren, judge between us. Who has acted responsibly? Judge ye, who has been defrauded. Call the Prophecy Club (785) 266-1112, email them: prophecyman@cjnetworks.com, and let them know that Stan Johnson should repent of his error, and make things right. He will not. He will use all of his resources and all of his network to try to destroy me. But he cannot harm me. He who is with me is greater than those that are with him.

STAN JOHNSON. Repent of all of this. Make it right with the Lord, and with those that you have defrauded. Repent, and go unto the Lord Jesus Christ for the salvation of your soul. The wrath of God soon will be unleashed on this planet - do not suffer the punishment that is the righteous payment for your works.

Your servant in Christ Jesus,

Michael Bunker

DISAGREE? Discuss or Debate this: Forum

Read more like this: Bunker Mentality Archives

Proceed back to the Homepage...

Back to the top!