Behold: The One World Cult

Posted by Michael Bunker

***This is the transcript of Michael Bunker’s sermon on the prophetic/religious condition of the world today.  His sermon is based primarily on the responses to his article on the “Passion”.  Editing has been left to a minimum, so it won’t read like a usual article; it is, for the most part, left like it was delivered.  We want to thank the transcribing committee for their work in transcribing Michael’s sermons ***

“Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee” (1 Timothy 4:16)


March 4, 2004 – We had a pretty interesting last 8-9 days since my article on the “The Passion” movie came out. We’ve had a steady 300% increase in “hits” on the website, peaking on Thursday when we had an 800% increase over our normal traffic.  Because of that, there has been not only a lot of questions about my own personal position on the movie, “The Passion,” but also questions on the doctrines and the prophetic implications of the movie. I have determined that I was going to discuss those issues today as much as I can.


It is necessary for those of you who are listening at home (around the world), or if you’re watching the video tape of this sermon, that you have a bit of background on what it is we are going to discuss; so, if you are able, go to and read the original article on “The Passion” that is posted on the front page.  Secondarily, for background purposes, I’m going to discuss some things in relation to a doctrine series that I did where we discussed the doctrine of the Papal Antichrist and the False Prophet.  These articles can be found at our website in the “Critical Doctrines” section.  If you need to get rehearsed on those, please do.


Those here in the homegroup, if you need to go back through those teachings, it would help you understand what I am going to say today if you understand the historic teaching of the Church (the historic Protestant Church) on who the Antichrist is, who the False Prophet is, and those things.  If you can study those it will help you understand what we are going to talk about tonight.


1 Tim 4:16, Paul writing to Timothy warns him and says:


“Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.”


Anyone who has even a cursory knowledge of the Doctrines of Grace knows that anything that we do does not (and cannot) save us.  There is nothing we can do to save ourselves eternally as far as our salvation goes.  Paul here is talking about temporal salvation; the salvation from the everyday calamities and curses that can come upon us for disobedience and the hardships that also come upon us for all manner of disobedience.  Paul says,


“Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee.”


We should understand from this (and of course only a hard-core Arminian would come to the conclusion after reading this that it is possible to save yourself) that this is temporal salvation in view, and we also understand from this how important doctrine is and the preaching of doctrine is.


With all the hostile e-mails I have received over the last couple of weeks; last week or so from pastors, I would say to them:


What doctrine is taught is very important. And, according to Paul, by teaching to proper doctrine, it is possible temporally to save both yourself and other people.  You are responsible for the souls placed under your care and you will give an answer for them, and if you don’t warn people about things that are blatantly dangerous then that penalty will be meted out on you personally and on those who you failed to warn.”


This is a very, very important thing we are studying here.  Christian men throughout the history of the Church, through study, prayer and revelation, have come to the conclusion that the religious system would eventually, through time, evolve into a one-world cult.  This has been the teaching of the Church since very early on. I’m going to go back 700 years, starting:


1.     In 1310 with Dante Alighieri,

2.     You can move forward to John Wycliffe in 1379,

3.     1412 John Huss,

4.     1497 Savonarola, who was the Italian Reformer,

5.     In 1522 Martin Luther taught it,

6.     In 1550 William Tyndale, who gave you the text that became your KJV Bible, taught it,

7.     In 1553-54 Latimer and Ridley, who were killed for their faith,

8.     Thomas Cranmer who was killed for his faith in 1582,

9.     1587 John Foxe who wrote “Foxe Book of Martyrs”,

10. 1600 King James the 1st who chartered the KJ Bible,

11. 1654 Thomas Goodwin,

12. In 1727 by Sir Isaac Newton,

13. In 1754 by Dr. John Gill.


Even that hyper-Arminian John Wesley taught this fact in 1764, that the Papacy was the antichrist and that the religious system would evolve into a one-world cult in the end-times.


This is the point I am making here - if you study history, specifically if we study Christian history, you will come to the conclusion soundly that it is impossible to believe that we are in the end-times, and at the same time deny that the Church has taught throughout history that the last days religious system would be apostate and would evolve into a one-world cult.


You must (if you know anything about history of the Christian Church) come to the conclusion that the most important feature of the last days religious system (if you believe that we are in the last times) is its apostasy.


Why in the world has the world religious system come to the conclusion that we are in a great revival or that this movie particularly is going to be on the forefront of a great revival?  The Bible prophesies general apostasy and shows that the religious system will be moving into a one-world cult. When we see that the Protestant Movement is steam-rolling right back to Rome, heading right back to into the arms of the Pope, why in the world do they really believe that we are in the last times?


They’ve somehow separated in their mind with the teachings of the Church and what is patently obvious about what is going on in the world.  All of these great giants of the faith (and thousands more, by the way) were killed by the Papist Church; each pronouncing at the risk of their own lives, that the Roman Catholic Church:


1.     Was the Antichrist of the Bible.

2.     That the Pope of Rome was the man of sin, the son of perdition .

3.     He was revealed and has been revealed consistently for over 700 years.


For 700 years, the Church of Jesus Christ has come to the uniform conclusion that the Pope of Rome and the Papacy were the Antichrist, and somehow over the last 100 or so years, this has been obscured beyond recognition and so this is an underlying foundation of what I’m going to talk about tonight.


The Great Deception that is spoken about in the scriptures says that “many will be deceived”; in fact if you weren’t the very elect, you would be deceived.  This is what we need to understand, when we posted the article on “The Passion”, our position was very, very simple: the 2 nd commandment forbids any images of the Godhead or any member of the Godhead. This was the position of the Church from before the Protestant Reformation.  It has been almost uniformly the position (and I am going to read some quotes in a little while of the position of the Reformers) of the Puritans and the Pilgrims and the Founders of this nation, that to even make a picture of Jesus Christ was idolatry and a violation of the 2 nd commandment.  All I’m saying is that now, if I stand up here in the year 2004 and merely repeat what has been taught in the Church for 700 years, we can find out exactly where we are on God’s timeline by looking at how the world reacts to the statements that have been the plain teaching of all our belief system for 700 years.


Histrionics panic, absolute anger, hatred, threatened violence; merely for standing up and saying, “Listen, the Church has always taught:


1.     That we don’t make any images of God, and,

2.     That the Pope is the Antichrist.”


So now we should realize that if one of the Pope’s henchman makes an image of Christ, all he is doing is trying to drag the protesting Church right back to Rome.  So why did 100 million people have to die if all we’re going to do is walk right back into the arms of Rome and act like nothing ever happened?  It is important that we not only understand why this is going on, but where we stand prophetically because of what is evidently going on.  So-called “Protestant” ministries (it’s amazing to me if you look at the people in our group here who have been on web forums that call themselves “protestant” all over the country) have kicked our brethren off of their web forums merely for repeating what the Church has taught for 700 years!  They have kicked them off and said that “we will have NO discussion or criticism whatsoever of the Roman church”.  They say that somehow now, to criticize the Antichrist, is hate and is un-Christian.  Think about that for just a moment if you would right before you lay your head down tonight; just think about that sentence— in America today it is considered un-Christian to criticize the Antichrist.  For someone who says “well, we don’t believe the Papacy is the antichrist”, I say “What you believe is immaterial.  It is what the Bible says, it’s what the Church has taught since the time Christ walked the earth.”  The Bible teaches, and the Church has taught that there would be the coming of a “man of sin”:


1.     That man would take upon himself the name of Christ,

2.     That he would say he is Christ’s representative on earth,

3.     That he would do away with God’s laws,

4.     That he would institute his own laws,

5.     That he would sit as a moderator or some type of intermediator between God and man.


This has been the prophecies that the Church has been watching for 2000 years, and all we’re saying is that this has not only happened, but it has happened right before they eyes of the Church!  If you’ll look around today—to say anything against it (the RCC) today—it makes you a hater.  It makes you somehow a “non-Christian.” So-called “Protestants” today have united their efforts to legitimize the Church of Rome and anybody who denies that fact is a liar and the truth is not in them.


If you go down the list of those who have supported this movie, you’ll not only find a list of people who have continually, throughout their careers, supported the Church of Rome; but they have either passively or actively written or taught that the Church of Rome is a legitimate Church.  They will say that although the Catholic Church may have some errors that they are still Christian in nature.  I will tell you this; you can be a lot of things at a particular time and still be a Christian.  You can be a whore and be a Christian.  You can be a murderer and be a Christian.  You can commit all manner of sins and still be a Christian.  But there is one thing you cannot be and be a Christian — that is Anti-Christian.   You can’t be Anti-Christ and be a Christian, it is impossible; that is simple logic.  I could spend some time here and go through the scriptures and go through that with you, but it is patently true that you can not be Anti-Christian and be a Christian.


Mel Gibson is a Roman Catholic and is blatantly Jesuitical… I’m going to, here in a little while, go back through the history of the Jesuit Order, a real quick run through with you of their history of infiltrating short-robes (Jesuit agents) into different positions, whether it be as activists in the theater and movies, actors, lawyers, assassins like John Wilkes Booth who was a Roman Catholic actor, those types of people… but Mel Gibson has over the past 10-15 years endeared himself to the Christian community, I should say the so-called Christian community and the Patriot community, through movies like Braveheart and The Patriot.  These movies, even his Conspiracy Theory -  (even though at the end of that movie it kind of made a joke out of conspiracies), did expose some interesting things that are truly going on in the world -- but because of these movies and his willingness to make them, Mel Gibson has made himself a hero with the Patriot community and what we’d call the “Resistance-to-Big-Government” community.  Now, because of that, this movie was a perfect setup.  I quickly saw when the Patriot movement started pushing this movie, that it had been the perfect set-up.  You can actually look back and see how they (the Patriot community) were set-up.  Some of them were just set-up and some of them are people who have been planted within that movement, agitprops, agents provocateur, etc.  Specifically I would mention Alex Jones who is evidently a Roman Catholic -- who sold himself as some kind of patriot leader (who everybody ought to be very, very wary of) who is pushing this propaganda big time.  The Patriot community, for the most part was already (and this is one of the reasons I don’t participate or have anything to do with the Patriot movement):


1.     Anti-Semitic.

2.     Looking for a hero.


Mel Gibson stood up to make a movie of a false “Christ” that matches the false “Christ” that these people have made up in their heads – and you can see these people rushing to embrace what they considered (and hoped) to be an anti-Semitic movie.  If the Jews didn’t like the movie, you knew the Patriot movement would LOVE it.  So the movie was tailor-made to take the Patriot movement off the map and to bring them right into the same one-world movement they spend page after page after page on the Internet saying they are against.


So, Mel Gibson captured their imagination, fed right into what was expected of him.   The Roman Catholic church has subverted and taken over the Patriot movement (of course we expected this for some time, since the intelligence agencies that have infiltrated and controlled the Patriot movement are all run by Catholics).


Let me tell you really quickly that the whole idea that this movie, from the beginning, that people came out against this movie as anti-Semitic is a lie.  Nobody was against this movie.  In fact, nobody really knew what was going to be in the movie.  The Jews had not come out against previous movies about “Christ”, like the Jesus movie, which showed some of the various things that these supposed objectors say they don’t like about this movie.  The fact is that Mel Gibson began leaking that the movie was going to be boycotted because it was anti-Semitic before anybody ever said anything, over a year before the movie was to be released.  It was part of the plan.


Right at the opportune time, a couple of globalist plants in the ADL who were Jesuitical plants (who have always stood up to take the side of that particular New World Order group) stood up and started saying that this movie was anti-Semitic.  Now that smells like a plant to me; when nobody is saying anything and Mel Gibson suddenly comes out and does interviews and says he is being attacked and his father has been threatened because his movie is anti-Semitic; then all of a sudden you get a couple of talking heads in the ADL who pop up saying the movie is anti-Semitic.  This has been a diversion from the very beginning to take attention away from the fact that the movie is Anti-Christian; it is not anti-Semitic at all -- it is an anti-Christian movie.  You see?  It is very easy to take people’s minds off the real issue when you start talking about something that doesn’t even matter.  Since when has the Christian Church ever consulted Judaism to decide if a movie is OK?  They never have, and all of a sudden this thing blows up and nobody asks the question that’s really at the core of this —





That is the real question, you see, but that is the question that can’t be asked.  The movie is anti-Christian, not anti-Semitic.  Nobody wanted to ask any questions about Mel Gibson’s’ beliefs because over the past 20 years, during the time that most of you and I have known each other, the whole religious system has moved towards a full embrace of the Roman Catholic system.  If you follow the Charismatic movement, the Promise Keepers or any of these other supposedly neo-Protestant movements, every one of them, has embraced Roman Catholicism; so the fact that Mel Gibson was a Roman Catholic didn’t raise anybody’s ire or concern whatsoever.  Mel Gibson is not only Roman Catholic, but he is a pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic.  There have been a couple of words about this on the Internet, but most people don’t even know what that means when you say a man is a pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic.


Vatican II, which happened in the mid-1960’s, changed the way the Roman Catholic Church operated.  Prior to that, in the historic Roman Church, the masses were done in Latin.  According to many of the most conservative members of the Roman Church, because of those traditions, the miracles that they believe happened during the Mass, happened because of the tradition.  So if the Mass is properly done in Latin, by a properly ordained priest, then they believe that transubstantiation actually happens during the Mass.  Now, according to Mel Gibson, in his TV interview with Diane Sawyer, he believes that when they stopped doing the Mass in Latin, transubstantiation stopped happening.  So he believes, other than in a few scattered places, those miracles have stopped happening in the Roman Catholic Church.  Most people don’t realize that the Pre-Vatican II Catholics believe that this Pope -- John Paul II -- is the AntiChrist, and they believe that the Vatican has become AntiChrist.  I get emails all the time from Pre-V2 Catholics who send me info and agree with me that the Roman Church is the antichrist; but I have to tell you that whenever you see insurrectionist groups -- like pre-Vatican II Catholics — you can always find the black robe (Jesuits) somewhere around there.


The Pre-V2 movement has been infested with Jesuits since the very beginning.  They don’t mind hating a Pope that goes against their power.  The Jesuits have killed at least 2 Popes. You can find that information in “The Vatican Assassins”, by Eric Phelps.  Any time there has been a liberalizing movement in the Catholic Church, the Jesuits have started a counter-movement just like they did with the pre-Vatican II movement at the time of Vatican II. And so there is no surprise then to see Mel Gibson rise up out of the pre-Vatican II Jesuitical Movement that happened about that time.


Mel Gibson says he believes that transubstantiation has not happened (except in a very few places) since the Vatican II.  So he opened his own church that does the Mass according to the old ways, according to the Old Latin.  Because of that, he believes that the miracle of bread and wine actually turning into Jesus, happens at his church in California.


Some of you may be saying, ‘what does that have to do with what we are talking about?’  It has everything to do with what we are talking about because those miracles and transubstantiation in particular, are what causes -- according to the pre-Vatican II Catholics -- the Catholic Church to have the authority to act against those who are heretics.  You see if you are a heretic yourself, you don’t have the authority to burn another heretic, but if you are doing things right and the miracles are happening and transubstantiation is happening in your church, then you then have the authority to act out what the Jesuits proposed in the 15-1600s, which was the destruction of all non-Catholics, even to the point of murdering them or burning them at the stake, which is why they had the Inquisition.  


We ought to be very, very careful of this pre-Vatican II movement, even if it seems on the surface like we both are against the Vatican.  Sometimes war makes strange bedfellows, but do not find yourself in bed with a pre-Vatican II Catholic just because you both think this pope is the Antichrist.  That is what has happened quite a bit (especially in the Patriot movement).


This is a classic dialectic.  Let me tell you how this works.  In Soviet Russia it was quite common to do what was called “the thaw.”  What would happen is Stalin, or Khrushchev, or Brezhnev, or whoever was in power, would start to liberalize and he would give power and greater freedom to the intelligentsia and to the literary giants to act with more freedom, and when he found out who his enemies were (this happened in both in Russia and China, too) they would round them all up and kill them or put them in the camps.  That is how they found out who your enemies are; you say, ‘oh, we’ve been too harsh, we’ve acted too rashly, so we want to open things up.’  Then you round up anyone who sticks their head out.  If you get a book called, New Lies for Old (I’ve got it here in the library), written by a man named Anatoly Golitsen in 1985 before the fall of the Soviet Union, you will find that he said that Perestroika and Glasnost  was actually this same type of movement, only on a bigger scale.  They were going to feign and fake the fall of the Soviet Union.  They were going to put the West asleep and, at its most vulnerable time, they were going to attack and destroy the U.S.  That book was written and published in 1985, and I have the book here in the library if anybody here wants to look at it.  This tactic of pretending like you’re weak when you are actually strong, actually (supposedly) came from the Chinese writer named Sun Tzu.  There are several books out there show where Sun Tzu never really wrote The Art of War.  It was actually written by a Jesuit priest, and perfectly describes Jesuitical tactics.  This is a Jesuitical tactic to pretend like you are weak and that’s when you strike. So the Catholic Church has taken from Sun Tzu and from Stalin and from Khrushchev, this idea of pretending like you are weak.


Now if you’ll follow the liberalization movement that has happened under Pope John Paul II (and going back to V2) you’ll know that every time that a major disaster hits the Catholic Church — such as the problem they’ve had with priests fondling little boys — it’s actually when the Roman church is on the move to ecumenicalism.  The biggest moves they make to infiltrate and destroy the Protestant Churches are when they show themselves to be weak.  So, you have the great movement like the Promise Keepers and all these ecumenical types of movements (like the Charismatic movement which is purely Jesuitical) happen while the Catholic Church acts like they are weak.  When they have scandals and these types of things is when you have to watch them, because that is when they are making inroads into destroying Protestantism.  This has happened continuously — this dialectic where you act like you’re weak and when the inevitable conservative backlash comes — you can say, “we are getting rid of this old guard that was touching boys out there behind the altar.”


The conservative wing of the Catholic Church is the Mel Gibson’s’ pre-Vatican II Catholicism.  Everybody is sick of the Catholicism that’s around today.  So who is going to complain when the Catholic Church says, “Hey listen, we’ve lost our bearings, we’ve lost our direction, we need to go back to the old ways?”  When you hear that and when they bring back those things, that is when you have to be very, very careful.


The dialectic is there.  The plan started during the Reformation and I wrote about this in Swarms of Locust, and we also have some videos available (Swarms, The Papal Presidency, etc.) If you haven’t read Swarms of Locusts, you need to read the book. The counter-Reformation was started in the 1540’s at the Council of Trent.  At the Council of Trent they decided they were going to destroy Protestantism no matter what the cost.  By doing so, the Jesuit Order was put in control. They would infiltrate:


1.     Universities

2.     Colleges

3.     Protestant seminaries

4.     Acting groups and guilds

5.     Doctors

6.     Lawyers

7.     All different manners of businesses


By doing so they would subtly push Protestantism to embrace the basic doctrines of Catholicism without having the name and the evil weight that was associated with those.  That is what Swarms of Locusts is basically about…the doctrines.


Counter-Reformation began to accelerate at the end of the 1500s and you saw people like Robert Bellarmine, Alcazar and Francisco Ribera begin to put forth prophetic views that were designed to protect the Papist Church from the accusation that the Pope was the Antichrist.  You have to put yourself back in that time.  By the 1590s it had already been taught within the protesting groups for over 200 years, that the Pope was the Antichrist, the Papist system was the Antichrist.  You’ve got a huge problem if you’re a Roman Catholic priest at this time because the scripture is plain that all of the things that the RC Church was doing was a fulfillment of prophecy about the “man of sin, the son of perdition.”  So they put the Jesuits to work (and this is all a matter of record), one on them, Alcazar, came up with the idea of ‘all prophecy has been fulfilled back in 70 AD, there is no more prophecy to be fulfilled.’  It’s called Preterism.  Modern Preterists don’t like that fact, that their pet beliefs are Jesuitical, but it is historical fact.  Then you have another guy, named Francisco Ribera, and his friend Robert Bellarmine (both Jesuit priests) who said, “Wait a minute, all prophecy is not going to be fulfilled until the very end of time, so we don’t have anything to worry about now.”  So either you believe it all happened in 70 AD, or it isn’t going to happen for 500 more years; either way, according to them, the Pope is not the Antichrist.


Brilliant move.


Those teachings began to infiltrate through people like Scofield (and his Jesuit Bible); they infiltrate the seminaries throughout America. At the turn of the century, around 1900, is when these things began to infiltrate the US.  They also, at the same time, began to infiltrate the security apparatus of most of the western nations:  spy agencies, police forces, the entire intelligence establishment, and the media through their schools.  Here in the U.S. the Jesuits run 33 major universities, like Georgetown University, Loyola, the University of Pittsburgh, and Xavier University.  You can go down the list and some of the most prosperous Universities in the U.S. are owned and operated by the Jesuit Order.


The intelligence apparatus of the U.S. began recruiting almost solely at these schools in the ‘50s-‘60s.  Many of the people who you see that run the FBI and the CIA, all graduated from Georgetown University: George Tenet, the heads of the FBI, people just like Bill Clinton, are all graduates of Georgetown University which is a Jesuitical University.  Their recruiting out of these schools guaranteed that they had people who were like-minded and who were also willing to advance their movement from stations of power.


All this began to come together over the last 20 years when we saw the rise to power in both the Democratic and Republican parties, people who either came out of these same schools, or came from schools like Yale University (and most people are aware of the Jesuitical/Masonic connection with Yale University).  Two “Yalies” are John Kerry and George W. Bush who has now been heralded by the entire so-called Protestant community, as a savior, as a “christian” despite all of the evidence to the contrary, despite all the evidence that his Christian beliefs are really more of a political ploy than they are legitimate (if you have an opportunity we have a videotape called “The Papal Presidency,” that shows this president’s connection to the Vatican going back through his father and his father’s father, all the way back to Nazi Germany).   For those of you who aren’t aware, Hitler, whom  was a Roman Catholic controlled by the Jesuit Order, modeled his SS after the Jesuit Order.


So you see Jesuitism rising in the United States through the Charismatic movement, through the great Pre-trib prophecy movement, and you see it growing and growing especially over the last decade.  At the same time they have gathered the control of the major intelligence apparatus, the government itself, and the presidency over the last 20 years.


Mel Gibson played right into this, knowing that there was an anti-government movement growing in this country in the early to mid 1980’s.  He began making movies that played right into all of this. At the exact same time, the great apostate religious phenomenon like the Toronto “Blessing”, the Pensacola madness that was going on, began what they called “the great new revival in America.”  It may have been a revival in some kind of religious piety but in reality was nothing more than a revival of Catholic mysticism and ecumenism that has happened over the last several hundred years.  We traced that in Swarms of Locust.


So Mel Gibson, as he began to plan the rollout of this movie, played the anti-Semite card and began gaining great attention toward this movie.  Jesuit Zionists out of the ADL then came out against the movie saying that it was anti-Semitic, which was a lie both on their part and on the part of Mel Gibson.


So we end up with the entire religious system in America and around the world embracing a film that is not only flawed, not only a bad movie factually and theologically, but one that is the most blatant violation of the 2 nd commandment that has ever happened since Jesus Christ walked the face of the earth.  They not only are embracing it; they are pushing it, hawking it, as if it is Jesus Christ Himself walking on that flat screen.  The indulgence pushers are back, and if you don’t think that this is an indulgence you are wrong.  You go down there and pay your ticket, and the Catholic Church says that if you believe that movie, then you believe the gospel and you are one of them.  There is a quote in my article on “The Passion” by the Pontifical Council which basically says “If you deny this movie, you deny the gospel. If you embrace the movie, you embrace the gospel.”  That is nothing but an indulgence; an indulgence for the price of a movie ticket.  All of this is happening right under our eyes.


The so-called prophecy hawks like Tim LaHaye, Grant Jeffrey and Hal Lindsey have warned us about a coming “ecumenical movement” for the last 15 years, then the minute the most blatantly ecumenical movie in history comes out, they all run down to see it and say if you don’t go see it, something is wrong with you.




Let me ask you a question. What is history for? Why did God even give us a historical perspective or the ability or the desire to record these things that we think and believe through time?  What is history for if it is merely to be ignored?  What is history for if we don’t learn anything from it?  If all we’re going to do is wake up everyday as if nothing ever happened before then and make all our decisions based on our five senses and what we think (which is to deify the thoughts and sensations of our own brains) then there is no need for history.  There is also no need to go forward because tomorrow is going to be just as hectic and as Godless as today.  History gives us the idea and the ability to know that there is a plan being worked out through history and will be worked out tomorrow.  History is going there.   That is our hope.


The reason I know I can trust God tomorrow is because the Holy Spirit has showed me that men trusted Him 2000 years ago.  People trusted him all the way to the burning stakes 500 years ago.  People trusted Him as they were being killed by the Roman Catholic Church in the late 1500-1600’s.  100,000 Albigenses and Waldensians trusted Christ as they were slaughtered by the Catholic Church.  Hundreds of thousands of Huguenots trusted Christ as they were nearly wiped out by the Papist Church.  Here is a little FACTOID for ya – why do the media get so worked up when some ignorant man like Mel Gibson’s father denies the Holocaust (despite all the overwhelming evidence), when the OFFICIAL position of the Church of Rome and their adherents is to deny the slaughter by the Roman Church of 100 million people in the middle ages?  Why don’t folks write to Mel Gibson and ask him about that?  History lets us know that God can be trusted even in persecution and general apostasy.  Christian men trusted God when they were shoved on boats and kicked out of Europe in the 1600’s.  Christian men have trusted God throughout all of history. History has a purpose.  That tells me that I can trust God tomorrow and the next day and the next day until my days on this earth are finished.  I can trust Him.  The only way I can know that is because I know history. Without history we end up in total and complete despair.


There is total despair when there is no history; because if I wake up and I have to decide today what I’m going to believe based on my five senses and what is “happening” to me, then there is no hope for tomorrow.  There is no hope at all.  I might as well end it all right now.  The entire world is committing suicide because they don’t know history.  They are killing themselves everyday because they don’t know history and if all you try to do is tell them, “Let’s take a look at what the Puritans said and the Pilgrims said and those of our forefathers said”, they say, “I’ll have none of that history, I’m going to start off tomorrow like I started off today, ignorant and stupid and fat! And I’m just going to keep killing myself until I go to hell!”  They might as well say that.  That is exactly what is going on.  People are diving headlong into hell.  It tells us in 1 st Timothy that we have the ability, sometimes, God-willing of course, to stop them, to say to them, “Let’s just take a look at scripture and see what that says. Let’s take a look at history and see what those men said.  Why did they have the strength to carry on?”


There is a love affair in this country with Roman Catholicism (or surreptitiously through their doctrines) and with Mel Gibson in particular and with George W. Bush.  Nobody asks the hard questions.  It hearkens back to the day of Hitler and Stalin, especially the earliest days of Adolph Hitler.  Here is another fact.  The love affair with Hitler would have ended abruptly if Protestant Germany had merely asked if the guy was a Roman Catholic.  Do you understand that they didn’t have to know anything about what the Nazi’s believed?  They didn’t have to know anything about his plans.  The cradle of the Reformation was Germany.  If they merely knew their history and they saw a man rising up that not only was a Roman Catholic but was evidently a Jesuitical agent (He came out of the ‘Theosophy’ movement with Madame Blavatsky – a purely Jesuitical/Satanic construct), all they had to do was to say, “We’re not having anything to do with that. We know their history.”  Do you know their history?  Do you know they have murdered and destroyed every nation they’ve ever been a part of?  Every nation that they ever get a hold of, God destroys it Himself?  You see?


The same thing happened with Stalin.  History is continuous and now we have a love affair in this country with Mel Gibson and George Bush.  It hearkens the mind back to the early days of Hitler and Stalin.  Let me tell you a little bit about Hitler and Stalin.  Hitler invaded Poland.  At the time he made all kinds of reasons why it was important to invade Poland.  In the back of his mind, of course, was the domination of Europe and ridding himself of the “Jewish” problem, becoming the king of the world.  Very quickly, within a year or two, it became evident to everyone on both sides that Hitler had lied to invade Poland. He lied.


The Soviet Union invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968 to stomp out the so-called “counter-revolutionary forces” that he thought were growing in strength in Czechoslovakia.  The fact was that the Czechoslovaks were really going strictly by what the Communists have always taught. They didn’t change with the Soviet Union.  The USSR changed.  When they didn’t change, the Soviets called that counter-revolution.  So they invaded based on a false pretense.  They invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968, and it was during a so-called “thaw,” the de-Stalinization in the Soviet Union.  What they really did was that they used the invasion as a reason to crack down on all resistance that was left in the Soviet Union in 1968, and the days of Stalin came right back.


Let’s look at our country.  George W. Bush just invaded Iraq and gave a long list of reasons why it was necessary to invade Iraq.  Here we are a year later and it is evident to anybody on both sides that they lied to invade Iraq.  But you know what you are told?  “That’s not that important because Saddam was a bad guy anyway.”  The lies aren’t that important, but at the same time the pretense for the invasion of Iraq (the false and lying war on terror) has allowed the Jesuitical forces in the intelligence agencies in this country to rise to absolute power.  You have Roman Catholics in charge of the office of Homeland Security in Tom Ridge.  You have other Roman Catholics as the top generals in the office of Homeland Security.  The head of the FBI and the CIA are all Jesuits, raised and trained at Jesuit Universities.  Here is the rise of the Jesuitical Order through the Secret Services, the Secret Police, at the same time that the leaders lie to invade another country.  Now tell me history doesn’t repeat itself… doesn’t it help to know your history?  If you knew your history, you’d know a couple of things right about right now:


1.     We’re in trouble. This country is in trouble.

2.     We’re (us in the true remnant) in trouble because I’m not going to shut up! I don’t plan on shutting up about it.


You can decide if you want to stick around for what necessarily happens to people like us who decide we’re not going to shut up.  History repeats itself. Welcome to the Gulags, folks!


The time is here. There was a cult of personality built around Stalin and Hitler.  It was not safe to criticize the administration.  It wasn’t safe to criticize the propaganda movies put out by Joseph Goebbles and all those propaganda guys during Hitler’s time (Remember that Hitler gathered together with the PASTORS first, in 1933).  It wasn’t safe to have an opinion other than that which the people in power told you that you were going to have.  I will tell you after the last week and a half of e-mails, we are in a very dangerous situation.  I honestly believe that if I said some of the things I’ve said tonight, some of the things I’ve said in that article in front of a large crowd in this country, we would get stoned.  These people are violent and if you haven’t read some of their e-mails that I’ve put on the Internet, they are violently angry at anybody who doesn’t support Mel Gibson, this movie and this President — they are violently angry.  The cult of personality around Mel Gibson and George Bush is frightening.


Let’s talk about persecution and censorship.  During the time of Hitler and Stalin and afterward, there was a strict form of censorship in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.  Quite often (I’ve been reading the memoirs of Aleksander Solzhenitsyn this week) the censorship was not overt, which is surprising.  The censorship was by intimidation.


There was a publication system in Soviet Russia where you could go to journals (like Novy Mir) and you could have your books or novels published by these journals.  There was a government censor who would read the book and say that there was some things you could say and you couldn’t say, but most of the books produced in Soviet Russia in the 40’s, 50’s & 60’s never made it to the censor.  The reason they never made it to the censor was because there was a cult of personality (a collective consciousness) that decided that it’s not worth it to get in trouble over it, so we’re not going to publish it anyway.  Even if the journal wanted to publish it, they wouldn’t even send it to the censors because they knew it would bring repercussions.


There was a counter-revolutionary freedom force in Russia at the time, and the word that they used was samizdat, which literally meant “self-publishing”.  There were no censors in self-publishing in Soviet Russia.  People that think that in Soviet Russia you could not have something published that was against the “group-think” of Soviet Russia, you’re wrong.  You could even go and self-publish a book that said that Stalin was the Antichrist.  For the most part, unless it got very popular or leaked to the West, you would have been somewhat safe, nothing lethal would probably have happened to you (Solzhenitsyn published First Circle and Cancer Ward, even Gulag Archipelago in samizdat).  You probably would have been threatened, you would have lost any party position, you would have lost your job, but you could have gone and lived on a farm somewhere or lived out in the woods like Solzhenitsyn did and you would have been relatively fine.  There was not the overt persecution that people have in their minds against most people that published in Russia.  Samizdat was a system of publishing that was quite often used by the resistance; in fact most of Solzhenitsyn’s books were published through samizdat.  This was a system of self-publishing that just bypassed the censors.


Recognize all the parallels.  In Soviet Russia you had one guy running for office.  At least they weren’t hypocrites.  You were allowed to vote for the one guy that worked for the Communist Party.  In America we are just hypocrites, because we put two guys who were in the same club, the same fraternity in college, running for president.  You can have flavor A, or flavor B. That is the way this cult of personality works.


Now, none of my books have been accepted by a mainstream publisher, not one.  In fact, we had a mainstream publisher for Swarms of Locusts , who accepted the book.  They said they read it and loved the book, and they then got threatened by Marty Stacy, Dave Hunt and the Arminian so-called “Christian” mainstream publishing cult a couple of days before we signed a contract on the book.  They suddenly decided that they had misread it and that it was a horrible book and they couldn’t publish it, which is exactly what happened in Soviet Russia in the 50’s and 60’s.  The publishers realized that the book was unpublishable under the current cult of personality.  It is my opinion (and maybe some brave publisher out there wants to prove me wrong) that it is impossible to have a book published today (outside of our own samizdat), a legitimate book that challenges or criticizes:


1.     The one-world cult religious system

2.     This particular President (unless it is within the realms of the Jesuitical system of bi-jesuitical politics, like if you are a liberal Democrat you are allowed to criticize the president because whether John Kerry wins or George Bush wins, hey, you still have a Jesuit in the White House who went to Yale and was a member of the “Skull and Bones”.)


Let’s see if I’m wrong.  If history holds true, there will be tens of thousands of people who will either hear this sermon or read the transcript of it.  Let’s see if some publisher out there believes that there is still room in America for true, pointed religious debate and differences of opinion.


If you want to get a book published… I guarantee, I challenge the people who are listening to my voice… we’ve had 180,000 hits to the website in the past week, and I can’t get a book published in this country.  Check it out for yourself.  Think about that.  Tell me that we’re not in the same age of Soviet-style censorship… now I can go through self-publishing, through America’s samizdat, and as long as the book doesn’t become too popular or something doesn’t leak out to the wrong people, then probably I’m fairly safe in this country.  We’ll see how long that lasts.


There is a need in this country for brave men and brave women who refuse to cow-tow to the type of terrorism and threats that we’ve had over the past week.  We need a new literature in this country that exposes this system.  You can not overwrite what we are talking about today.  There is an inexhaustible amount of information and we need people out there with some talent, with the ability to expose this system, to write true literature that we can get out to the people. It worked in Nazi Germany, and it worked in Russia.  Resistance works.


What God plans to do with it after we write it, I don’t care. We need people of courage, people who don’t care about persecution and censorship, personal slander and those types of things. We need true resistance literature in this country – that literature does not now exist.


(MB’s note: I’m not really talking about underground “expose” books, those are great, but there are plenty of those.  The system has succeeded in marginalizing those materials and writers so that no one will read them.  I’m talking about real literature – “fiction” books, short stories, etc. that show the reality.  The Soviet Union was inexorably weakened by such literature.)


When most of the people on my e-mail list and most of the people who are supposedly in the resistance in this country, listen to somebody like Alex Jones, a Roman Catholic liar who is now pushing this movie, we’ve got a problem, because the enemy is controlling the resistance.  What we need is true resistance literature in this country.  It is time for heroes, and it’s time for martyrs and it’s time for people to stand up and talk about those things that somehow that cult of personality has decided can’t be talked about… I will tell you this, I’ve had dozens of e-mails from people, from forums and elsewhere, from people who received my article who’ve said, “Finally, somebody said the unspeakable.”


Think about that.


We just finished going through a quick review of history going through Stalin, Stalinism, the cult of personality, censorship and publication,  propaganda in Hitler’s Germany, etc.; and the point, of course (as we move forward specifically tying it to the movie, “The Passion”), is that now the ecumenical movement has a new impetus.  We see the emergence of the One World Cult embracing Catholic doctrines and Catholic mysticism through not only this movie, but through that which has happened through the charismatic movement, Promise Keepers, the Vineyard movement, the Prophecy movement, and those things that have thrived in the last several years.


The enemy now is arrayed for battle. Their flags are unfurled.  They are surrounding the elect.  We once thought we were small when it was just those of us who believed and understood about the New World Order.  Then the Lord let us into the full knowledge of the Doctrines of Election and the Doctrines of Grace and we realized how truly small we really are.  And now we see the largest propaganda movement by the Jesuit Order counter-reformation since the 1530’s, and we see how truly minuscule the elect of God truly is.


So many people have been deceived by this movie that it is more and more difficult to cut through the rhetoric. I want to talk about the responses to any criticisms to the movie.


It is evident now that any criticism to the movie is not only anti-Catholic but is hate.  I explained to one of my attackers this week after he said, “Why do you hate the Catholic Church?”  I said, “Well, it’s not necessary for me to discuss why or if I hate the Catholic Church.  God hates the Catholic Church.  The reason he hates the Catholic Church is because it is Anti-Christ.  It is very simple.  That doesn’t take a lot of deep reasoning and understanding to see that God hates Anti-Christ.  That is completely reasonable for God to hate that which hates His Son and tries to draw away and destroy souls.  God hates the Catholic Church”.


They will say, “Why do you hate Catholics?”  I don’t have any regard (as in an emotion) whatsoever for Catholics or so-called Protestants or Mormons or anything else like that.  I have the same regard for them (because they were created in the image of God) that I have for any fellow man.  So I believe that I don’t have the right to murder them.  If one of them is hungry, I believe I should feed them.  If one of them is injured, I believe we should take care of them.  If one of them is thirsty, I believe we should get them a glass of cool water.  I even pray for them to be regenerated, but, I don’t believe that there is any requirement for me to have an emotional attachment to that which hates God.  I have no regard for them in that way whatsoever.


What they are calling hate… let me give you a quick review of what hate is in America today… If I don’t care (emotionally) about something, but you don’t like what I say — that’s hate.  If you hate me, then I am guilty of hate.  If I come up to someone who is a homosexual and the homosexual blatantly yells out and flaunts his homosexuality, and I say, “God hates homosexuality”, they’ll say that’s hate, even if I have no hateful emotion at all: I have no hatred, no anger, I’m merely telling them what the Bible says, Psalm 5:5:

¼thou hatest the all workers of iniquity.”  I have no emotion about it one way or another.  However the homosexual is mad as hell because I had the courage in this day of the cult of personality and political correctness to say it!   He is burning with hatred for my insolence!  He hates me for saying it, so he says, “You hate!” He projects his hatred on me.  If I send out an article that merely says what was the consistent position of the Protestant Church, even before the Protestant Reformation, even going back 700 years; that the Church believed that you absolutely could not make any likenesses of the Godhead (that has been the teaching of the Church for 700 years); if I say that, they say, “Well, you hate Catholics.”  I don’t hate Catholics.  You hate me.  You hate me because I have the guts to tell you the truth and what the Bible says, you see?  You want to shut me up.  You are burning with hatred because somebody got out of your fascist party line.


Hatred is no longer something that I feel for someone else; it is what someone feels for me.  I’m guilty of hate if someone hates me.  That’s what happens in the cult of personality that is America today.


Let’s discuss the destruction of the Bible as the foundation for truth.  One of the greatest lessons for the students here, at our little chicken farm/theological seminary over the last week, has been to debate this issue on the Internet forums all around the country and around the world.  The one lesson the students here have learned is that no one cares about the Bible any more, don’t bring that out as evidence.  Flat out!  I got an e-mail from a lady who posted my article on a forum and the guy wrote his answer, “Of course the movie is an image, of course it’s an image of God. We all need pictures and idols of God so we’ll know what to worship.” That’s what he wrote!


The brothers here will tell you that they have received e-mails much the same, that either say, “Well, I’m not worshipping the picture; I’m not worshipping the movie, so it must be all right.”  These people don’t know anything about the 2 nd commandment or its purpose, and when you bring up what the purpose is, they just call you a hater, and they delete you, they kick you off the forum, religious censorship.  Now this is not a guy proposing Mormonism or some other cult.  This is not proposing some heresy.  This is merely stating what the True Church itself taught from the Reformation until just a little while ago.  A forum is supposed to be a place for discussion of issues.   But discussion is only available for those who are part of the One World Cult.  If you’re not part of the cult and you’re willing to say… in one of the cases, I believe it was Alex, he just posted a scripture and got 11 pages of tirades from people that were mad because he dared to post a scripture!  Alex just posted the scripture, the 2 nd commandment.  One guy called it a subtle way of attacking the Catholic Church!  On a so-called “Protestant” forum!


So you see that they have destroyed the idea that the Bible is the foundation of truth.  I got into a long — 12-13 page -- e-mail conversation with a lady.  She was very shrill at the very beginning (typing with all caps with exclamation points) about how angry she was that I was willing to write this article.  So I began to talk to her about the doctrines of Grace and about the Bible and her first response was, “Well, everybody interprets the Bible differently."  Isn’t that convenient?  That means we all have our own Bible and whatever it means to you is just fine and whatever it means to me is just fine!  Well, that’s fine as long as there is never a Day of Judgment, because I can tell you that the final Judge is going to use it pretty objectively, it won’t be subjective at all.  Your opinion won’t count on Judgment Day, I can promise you.  What you think about the Bible will have nothing to do with your final judgment before Jesus Christ.  You know what is going to matter?  What it (the Bible) says is going to matter.  Your interpretation and my interpretation are immaterial because the Bible says what it says.  There is not room for your interpretation and my interpretation.  Now, don’t get me wrong, I absolutely believe my interpretation is right.  But, how do we know if it is?  Let’s read the whole Bible together and if you can find a place that contradicts my position, in context, then we’ll discuss it and we’ll come to a conclusion as to whether or not I’m right or I’m wrong.  There is an absolute right and wrong in every opinion about the scriptures.


So that is the first argument you hear, “Well that’s just your interpretation, just your opinion.”  When the 2 nd commandment says, “THOU SHALT NOT …” that really isn’t about my opinion.  It’s about what God is saying.


The second argument you’re going to hear is called the “counter scripture” argument.  People actually believe that if they can find a scripture, tear it out of its full context, and use it to counter your scripture, then they cancel each other out!  They’ll say, “Well, what about the nation of Israel, they made a serpent on the staff.  Didn’t God tell them to do it?”  Absolutely, He did.  God told them to do it, that is the point.  Not only that, but when it became an idol, when they began to worship the staff, God took it away from them and destroyed it.  It’s the same thing with the cherubim.  You know what?  You can’t find any of that stuff today.  Bring it out; let’s take a look at it.  The reason you can’t find it is because God took it away because people began to worship it.  He will not share His Glory with another.  Those things were separate because God commanded them to be made (not only did He command them to be made, but He even told the people that were making them, “you’re not going to use your own wisdom and understanding in making this, I’m going to give the artisans the wisdom directly, supernaturally, to make it”.)  He also left us the Biblical record of His command, just to make sure that there wasn’t any confusion; He left a historical record in the scripture, how they were made and what they were made of and that He had commanded that they be made.  If someone will bring up a scriptural historical record of God commanding Mel Gibson to make this movie, I’d be glad to discuss that with you.  Outside of that, it is outside the bounds of scripture, and it is unauthorized.


We’ve gone through two arguments so far:


1.     That’s just your interpretation

2.     The counter scripture


Here is another one: #3 Teaching by what is not  there.  When someone says, “Well, in the movie they show things that didn’t happen in the gospels,” these brainwashed people will say, “Well, how do you know it didn’t happen then?  Because it’s not in the Bible.”


Well, how do I know Jesus wasn’t riding on a skateboard going to the cross?  It doesn’t say it.  Is it safer to assume that something not in the Bible did happen or didn’t happen?  To start teaching that things might have happened because they’re not in the Bible is an open door to come up with whatever quackery you want to come up with.  That’s a fool’s way of interpreting scripture, by deciding you’re going to worship according to your own mind based on what is not in the Bible.  “Well, it’s not in the Bible, so it’s OK”.  


There were two positions that were taken during the Reformation time.  The Catholic Church said if it’s not forbidden in the scriptures, then it must be OK, and the Protestant church said, “No, if it’s not allowed in the scripture, we don’t do it.  We do what the scripture says we’re allowed to do.”


Listen to these arguments!  When I call someone a Catholic, and they say, “Well, I’m not a Catholic”, I’ll say, “Well, if I just go down the list of all the arguments you give me, they are Catholic arguments.  You say it’s OK to have this idol because you say you don’t worship it.  Well, the Catholic Church in their Catechism says that its OK to have a statue of Mary or a statue of Michael as long as you are not worshipping it but worshipping God through it.  Isn’t that what the children of Israel did in the desert?  That’s exactly what the Bible says they did.  They didn’t worship the golden calf; they said they were worshipping the true God THROUGH the calf.  They say, as long as it causes greater devotion to God through the item, I’m OK.’”  That is the same argument that has been made by James Dobson and all the other so called Protestant leaders; it’s OK to worship God through this idol that was made by this Roman Catholic Jesuit.  Does that make sense? That is argument #3.


Argument #4: “I don’t know or care what the Bible says, I just love Jesus.”  Well, you have a problem here because the Bible that you don’t care about and you don’t care what it says, says that there will be “another Jesus”, and “many Christ’s”, take heed that you are not deceived.  Pretty ironic and somewhat morbidly hilarious to know that the warning against that opinion is in the Bible that they refuse to read because they don’t think it’s important because they just love Jesus.  How many e-mails have we received this week that said, “Come on, just give us a break, we just love Jesus. You’re talking about a bunch of stuff the Bible says.”  Yeah.


Argument #5: “You are just a legalist.”  That is interesting, because the same people who tell me that I can’t drink a beer or smoke a cigar; the same people who tell me if I don’t dress right, if I don’t act right, if I don’t show up on Sunday, if I don’t bow the knee to some modern priest at the pulpit down here at the street corner harlot “church” that I’m not saved — these people have created an entire list of rules that aren’t even in the scriptures!  They say, “Invite Jesus into your heart” — find that in the scripture.  Walk down an aisle and say some prayer to a priest (Pastor) -  find that in the scripture. All this stuff they do down here on Sunday, list after list of stuff that is not in the scripture, but they demand that you and that I do it; and then the one time that we point out the 2 nd commandment and say, “You’re not supposed to do that”, they scream, “You legalist!”


The most legalistic group in the history of the world is the One World Cult that we live in today.  All you have to do is put my picture on the Internet with me holding a beer (the Puritans called beer “the drink of moderation”) and a cigar and all hell would break loose!  Two things that aren’t even mentioned in the scriptures!  But if I print the 2 nd commandment and put it on a forum, I’m an anti-Catholic hater. What a legalist!  It’s insane!


Here is a good one I got:  ‘History is for dead guys.’  Brilliant argument.  I hope that you utilize a little bit of history when you pass through the next traffic light.  I hope something that you’ve learned in the past occurs to you when you decide whether you are going to have “Windex” or wine to drink with dinner tonight.  (Oh, I forgot, wine is forbidden, but images of God graven on film are ok).


History is important; it is just based on your perspective.  For small and ignorant minds, I hope that it (your historical perspective) goes as far back as to know that “Windex” is not good to drink, but for people who expect just a little bit more out of life, I hope you are willing to go back a little bit farther, maybe to the real Crucifixion and work forward from there until you find out what you are supposed to believe.  You think that that would be valuable?  That we at least go back to the real Crucifixion?


Let me tell you this, in Mel Gibson’s movie, he’s got this little Satan, this little feminine Satan, following Jesus around.  Here is a tip for you: The Bible says that Satan was in Judas at the time…. pause… pause… Satan was in Judas.   Satan can’t be in more than one place at one time.  He’s not omnipresent.   (Mel Gibson made Satan omnipresent, and nobody cares!)  If Satan was in Judas, he was not walking around in the garden looking like a woman in drag.  Who is this that Mel Gibson has in the movie in the Garden of Gethsemane?  Satan was in Judas! You can’t just make up your own gospel account.  You don’t get to make up the story however you want to make it.  Just a little bit of history for those of you who are a little bit more adventurous. Let’s go back to the Crucifixion and study it in the scripture because God said that that (the Bible account) was enough for me to know about what happened to Jesus Christ.  But, if you don’t have that much historical perspective, don’t drink “Windex” tonight.  OK?  Don’t just drive through a red light because you’ve never seen one before.  That is about as far as I can help you.


The next argument (#6): Overall ignorance and stupidity.  You have to give people credit who are willing to admit that they are ignorant and stupid; that’s why they are going to the movie (and I’ve gotten a few of those).  Here is the ignorant and stupid argument: “Well, I want to know what all the hub-bub is about.”  That’s just saying –– I’m ignorant and stupid so I’m going to the movie anyway.  Here’s the e-mail I’ve liked: “How can you say anything about the movie, you haven’t seen it?”  Well, that is because it is a violation of the 2 nd commandment.  If they came down here and they built a whorehouse in Smyer, Texas and they wrote “Whorehouse” on it and they advertised in the newspaper that it was a whorehouse, and I said to the flock here: “Don’t go to the whorehouse”, these people would yell, “Legalist!  How do you know, you haven’t been there!”   The law hasn’t changed.  I’m not supposed to go to the whorehouse.  It’s all in Proverbs, go read about it.  I’m not supposed to go down there.  I don’t need to go down there and experience it so I can come back and give you a critical evaluation of the whorehouse: why it’s not good for you to go.  What this leads to, and now we get a little bit more serious, is the slaughter of the sheep by the so-called ‘shepherds.’


Turtullian wrote that an idolater is not just an idolater, he is a murderer.  He murders himself and everyone else around him.  What is happening today — the largest marketing arm in the world, the religious system in America today — is pushing idolatry.  The pastors have lined up, like the pimps that they are, to go down and push people into whorehouses and to push people down here into idolatry, and they don’t realize that idolatry is MURDER.  I’m going to read to you what Turtullian said:


"Set aside names, examine works, the idolater is likewise a murderer.  Do you inquire whom he has slain?  Well, if it contributes ought to the aggravation of the indictment, no stranger, no personal enemy, but his own self.  By what snares?  Those of his error.  By what weapon? The offense done to God.  By how many blows?  By as many as are his idolatries… Sufficient to itself is the name so inimical to God, a substance of crime so copious which reaches forth so many branches, diffuses so many veins, that from this name for the greatest part is drawn the material of all the modes in which the expansiveness of idolatry has been fore-guarded against by us.  Since in manifold-wise it subverts the servants of God and this not only when unperceived, but also when cloaked over, but if the head of unrighteousness is idolatry the first point is that we be fortified against the abundance of idolatry while we recognize it in its palpable manifestation.”


Turtullian’s point is that idolatry is murder.  Tertullian is saying that you had better be very careful not only to look for idolatry that is obvious… like if they built a big gold statue of a calf or of Caesar and they stand it on the temple in Jerusalem; that is blatant idolatry.  That’s the one you don’t have to worry about.  That’s the one that even the morons that write me and say, “Well I don’t think the Bible is important” are going to figure that deal out.  The idolatry that kills you and causes you to be a murderer is the idolatry that you try to gloss over because of your own personal desire to do something: your own desire to seek after that which is forbidden.  That is the idolatry to worry about.  Tertullian says that it not only makes you a murderer, but it makes you a self-murderer which is the worst kind.  The worst kind of murder is self-murder.


Pastor Lovebug down there in Alabama who is writing me telling me how many souls he’s saved while I’m busy bashing the poor Catholics, how much time he spends going out and preaching the gospel, at the same time he is pushing his church to go see this movie.  He piles them on the church bus to take them down to commit soul murder, he doesn’t even realize he is a soul-slaughterer: committing manslaughter, wholesale by the busload, by putting his bus full of people down there to go see this movie.  People think I’m being a little bit extreme, They say, “Hey, it’s just a movie”, well, what kind of penalty did Moses get for hitting a rock with a stick?  Those people who worshipped God through idols in the Old Testament had the ground open up under them and they were swallowed up.  You think God messes around with idolatry?  Not one bit.  Not one bit.  Idolatry is one of the most serious offenses, so serious that it’s contained in the first two commandments, there is one God, there is only one.  We can’t ever portray Him, it is impossible.  It is impossible to portray the fullness of the Godhead: even to try to portray Jesus Christ who is the fullness of the Godhead bodily is foolishness.


The Church spent years trying to write down the fact of the God/Man Jesus Christ: the fact that He was fully man and fully God, undivided.  For years they tried to rack their brains to write down in words the confessions that would let people know that you can’t… if you take a man and put a beard on him and call him Jesus, you can portray what you think about His manhood, but you can’t portray his Godhood; you have divided God in half.  That is not God.  Not only is it not His manhood (because we don’t know what He looked like) but you can’t even begin to portray His Godhood, and so you have taken Him and made Him less than what He is, it is necessarily less; and if it is less than God then it can’t be God, and it is necessarily then an idol, another Christ.  Another Christ that comes in his own name, that takes the name of Jesus Christ upon himself.


Pastor Lovebug doesn’t love his flock, he hates them.  He doesn’t love truth, he loves death.  Through his swelling words and self-appreciation he has convinced himself that he is the real lover of Christ.  In fact he has said it over and over again, “Where is your grace? Where is your love? While you are out there writing articles bashing other Christians, I’m talking to hundreds of people that are going to this movie, and I’m leading them to Jesus.”


Well, to which Jesus are you leading them?  Shouldn’t we be concerned as to which Jesus, or is it that any OL’E Jesus will do?  Pastor Lovebug’s self-appreciation has convinced his own self that he loves God, but the facts show that he hates God, and let me tell you why: He has a hatred for the truth.  He refuses to even address it.  He didn’t even address any of the scriptures that we mentioned in defense of our position.  He has a hatred of the truth, and the Bible says if you hate the truth — Jesus Christ is the truth – then you are a hater of God.  You are a God-hater if you hate the truth.  The Bible says all those who hate God, love death.  So what I can tell you about Pastor Lovebug in Alabama is that he hates God, and he loves death, and he is taking his people by the busload down there to experience it (the false Roman Jesus).  The larger Catechism -- the Westminster Catechism — put it this way and listen very closely, this was the teaching of the Church:


“The sins forbidden in the 2 nd commandment are: all devising, counseling, commanding, using, even approving any religious worship not instituted by God Himself, tolerating of false religion, the making of any representation of God or all or any of the three persons either inwardly in our mind or outwardly in any kind of image or likeness.”


That was what was taught to small children for hundreds of years, for hundreds of years, that if you make a likeness of Jesus, that is idolatry.  But it says not only that… I’ll tell you what; this was the Confession along with the Baptist Confession that was accepted by governments!  And the government of this country was founded on this and the other Protestant confessions.  These governments accepted, even approved of these things.  The Confessions said that approving a false religion is idolatry and a violation of the 2 nd commandment.  Approving of someone going to this movie (which is an attempted representation of One of the Godhead) is a violation of the 2 nd commandment.  It is soul-murder.


Remember how I told you in the last hour how important history is? The command forbids (According to Charles Hodge considered one of the greatest theologians in history. His book on Systematic Theology was read by almost every seminarian for 100 years prior to the last 50.):


“Not only the worship of false gods but also the worshipping of the true God by images.”


Some people argue, “Well, I’m not worshipping a false god, I’m worshipping the real God through an image.”  There is two arguments:


1.     I’m going to the movie but I’m not worshipping anybody, and,

2.     Why, I’m worshipping the true God, and the image just allows me to increase my devotion.


What is devotion if it isn’t worship?  We are going to get to that argument in a minute.  Here are some quotes from some of the most important and intelligent of the Puritan writers… It is become quite popular today to ignore history and to ignore foundation of this country and prophecy (true prophecy).  It has become quite the thing to do to create one’s own theology in one’s own mind and to base what you believe on what you want to do anyway or what fits into your current lifestyle.


Here is what the Puritan writers said:


“It is Christ’s’ Godhood, united to his manhood, that makes Him Christ.  Therefore to picture His Manhood when we cannot picture His Godhead, is a sin because we make Him to be but half-Christ.  We separate what God has joined.  We leave out that which is the chief thing which makes Him Christ.”  (Thomas Watson)


Another one:


“It is not lawful to have pictures of Jesus Christ because His divine nature cannot be pictured at all.  Because His body as it is now glorified, cannot be pictured as it is, and because if it do not stir up devotion it is vain.”


(He is saying if you go to the movie, and it doesn’t create devotion it is just vain.  Why are you going anyway?  It is just vanity.  Remember, that is the first argument that we just addressed… people say, I’m not going to worship anything.)  He continues:


“If it do stir up emotion it is worshipping, because devotion is worship, by an image or a picture and is so palpable a breach of the 2 nd commandment.” (Thomas Vincent)


Idolatry, especially idolatry that is sanctioned and marketed by the One World Cult (it is the religious system today that has approved this movie from the pope all the way down through all the major denominations including the great media whores on the radio today, from James Dobson on down), always leads to… any of you care about prophecy?  You know what always happens?  Idolatry that is sanctioned by the religious system in the government always leads to destruction of that nation.  Every time and in a short amount of time, a very short amount of time.  Government and religious sanctioned idolatry leads immediately to the destruction of that country.  Historically, it has happened every time.  Every time.  That is a firm law of history, you can write it down.


We cannot say but that this false image of Christ will be the most looked to, the most watched, the most worshipped image in all of human history.  We cannot but admit that the United States of America, her religious system, and her government have not only sanctioned and pushed and supported this movie and its theological system, but have been the fountainhead of this religious monstrosity.  This is a product of the false prophet (the United States of America and her religious system), and it points all power and worship to the Antichrist of Papal Rome.   The Judgment Day… if we were all to gather around the Throne today… the most idolatrous movie, the most idolatrous event in all of human history will have had its’ birth right here in your lifetime.  Right here on this soil.  This country’s state-sponsored and incorporated religious system has encouraged, produced, and marketed this idolatrous monstrosity. We can only, then, expect that God’s wrath is stored up and is ready to be poured out on both the Antichrist (the Papal system that sanctioned this movie and said that “it is as it was”), but also the False Prophet, the United States and it’s so called “Protestant” Churches that produced and marketed this image that inevitably gives all power and honor back to the first beast that produced it.


If you want to see a fulfillment of prophecy, this is the most blatant and obvious fulfillment of prophecy in your lifetime and mine, including the recapturing of Jerusalem and Israel by the Israelis in 1967-1973.  The most complete and important fulfillment of prophetic history in your lifetime and mine (and likely since the time of Christ) has happened with this movie.  That is pretty important.


Let me give you a little bit of a picture of why I believe honestly that this movie is inevitably going to move us into some very important prophetic events and in a very, very short amount of time.  First of all, it has solidified in the minds and the hearts of the people the image of both Mel Gibson and George W. Bush as the religious heroes of a new revival; a new revival that has Time Magazine, Newsweek and all the major magazines have put George W. Bush as it head.   Mel Gibson now is their new poster boy and so through the parallels of history that I showed you with Hitler and Goebbels, with Stalin, we now see the invasion of a foreign country at the same time that you have a major motion picture… by the way, do you know the name of the major motion picture was in Germany that brought about the same thing this movie does?  Triumph of the Will.  The Jesuit “Free-Will” lie.  Jesuits never change, never change.


We can see that we are in for some very, very interesting, fascinating days.  I honestly believe that we have the ability, right now, to know who to trust and who not to trust in these times.  We’ve been given the biggest clue, the biggest line in the sand so that we can know in the last days who we’re going to trust and who we’re not going to trust.  People who have been at the forefront of the prophecy movement or in the patriot movement who are embracing this movie cannot be trusted.  They cannot be hearing from God if they are telling people to go see this movie.


Second of all, those who have been silent or ambivalent about the movie, as far as I am concerned, can’t be trusted either.  The spiritually most mature people I’ve met wouldn’t touch this film with a 10-foot pole and the people who are the least spiritually mature either really don’t care or are not that troubled by it.  And the most spiritually wicked men are pushing people to go see this movie.  What we’ve had here is that God has given us this divine thermometer, or a meter whereby we can test who we can trust and who we can’t trust in the days that are to come.  What I would do, I would even go back a couple of weeks and see who was talking about this before it came out. There’ll be a lot of people hopping on the band wagon when some of the things we’ve exposed concerning the Jesuitical connections with the movie, their writing of the transcript, the screenplay and those things.  I hope to have that video if not next Monday or the Monday after… of Mel Gibson admitting that the Jesuits wrote the movie, those types of things so we can show you.  Once the people begin to understand that, then I think you’ll see other people jumping on the band wagon, I don’t trust them either.


For years if you have been following the Prophecy movement there has always been a question as to how all these different pieces of the puzzle were ever going to get together. For those of us who had been around the Patriot movement or been around the Prophecy movement or been around the politics in general, it seemed impossible.  But I think this crosses over, I think it’s not just a One World religion, I think this is a move towards the solidifying of tyrannical power in this country behind a fascist pseudo-Christian administration (whether it be Democratic or Republican).  Religion has inevitably become a part of what it is to be successful in politics today.  

George Bush has made that permanent and so in a nation where 80-90% of the people consider themselves to be “Christians”, the one unifying force then is that statement of faith, and I think we are going to see that play out itself in this election.  Not only that, but the ties between George Bush and the RC Church, which I went through in the Papal Presidency video, are obvious.


For those who follow prophecy it’s been very difficult to see how they would ever… get… for example, only a year or so ago you had James Dobson being called a hater by Katie Couric on the air.  Now you’ve got all these people in bed together.  The media, the right wing, and you have the religious elements of the left wing and the Patriot movement all supporting the same idea.


The concept is if you go back literally over the last 3-4 wars, they’ve not been national wars, but they have been religious wars including the war in Iraq — it was a religious war.  The war on terrorism is a religious war and it has religious overtones to it.  If we come to the conclusion that the new divisions in the world are not really national or international but they are religious, then you can come to see a tremendous backlash against liberal Catholicism.  Now you have the whole Protestant world applauding a pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic who wants to go back to the very conservative pre-Pope John Paul II Catholicism.  The next pope is going to be an ultra-conservative and he is going to go back on all the changes from Vatican II.  Anybody who has read Swarms of Locusts orVatican Assassins knows the Jesuit ties to the RC Church through the Nazis and all those types of things.  Pope John Paul II was very interestingly involved in WWII and in the rat lines that brought about the so called destruction of the Soviet Union.  In the book called Victory, where you can study how Pope John Paul II and George Bush Sr and another Jesuit named Bill Casey (head of the CIA) along with Gorbachev worked out a lot of the feigned fall of the Soviet Union which is written about in New Lies for Old, by Anatoly Golytsen.


So the next pope goes back to pre-Vatican II, reinstitutes all the Latin Mass and of course anybody who knows anything about Protestant history knows that when we go back in that direction we end up getting tied to stakes and burned alive.  Of course, it’s not the average Protestant that that’s going to happen to, because they’ve all gone right back to Rome through their Arminian doctrines.  They’re in the arms of Rome.  They are truly Roman Catholics.  They once called “protestants” separated brothers but they won’t be separated anymore.


All the basics of the RC faith are now eagerly embraced by Protestants. If you don’t think so, pick out a Christian forum today and go and post on there the basics of historic Protestantism at the time of the Protestant Reformation and you will be very quickly kicked off of that forum, banned from ever posting again.  That is just a fact.  That is why I’m saying that this is a very important prophetic event. It has accomplished what Sept 11 th didn’t accomplish, far more prophetic importance than that.


The second thing is I honestly thinkthere is a curse on that type of idolatry and when you see the lead actor being struck by lightening hanging on the cross—which happened to Jim Caviezel (which was admitted by Mel Gibson in the video from the Tonight Show that I’m going to show you when we get it), I think God is very, very interested in who goes to see this movie and I believe that when the Bible says there is going to be great deception, I believe that that deception is a spiritual deception that takes over people when they make a willful decision to do that which in their conscience they know is wrong.  For those people who have already gone to see it, repentance is still available, but I personally would make it a very, very important part of my life in the near future.  I think it is very dangerous.  I think minds are being turned, and souls are being destroyed, and when it says in 1st Timothy, in our lead off verse, that by telling the truth about doctrine, we save ourselves and others from death, I know that is what it is talking about. I think it is very, very important.


Dear Gracious Heavenly Father, we thank you so much for Your Grace and Your Mercy, Lord. We thank You so much that You’ve given us this window of opportunity to scream at the top of our voices what we know to be the truth.  Unite our hearts together Lord, give us strength to continue to stand. Heavenly Father, no matter what forces come against us Lord, we know that You are our Shield, our Buckler Lord.  We ask you to quench the fiery darts of the enemy Lord, to continue to be a hedge of protection around us in this homegroup.  Heavenly Father, we reach out to those who are like-minded all around the United States and around the world. We ask protection for them too, according to Your will.  Continue to give us wisdom and understanding as the days grow darker and darker, and be our light in Jesus Name.  Amen.


Your servant in Christ Jesus,

Michael Bunker